Who can and will
determine the beliefs, values, attitudes and convictions of our children? That is the problem stated at its most
basic level. It is not a question of whether children
and people develop and possess beliefs and attitudes as described by modern
behaviorism - they do, in part anyway. It is not a question of whether past
beliefs and attitudes have often acted to promote intolerance, injustice,
hatred and oppression - they have. It is not a question of whether the form
and details of society at any time is basically dependent upon the beliefs,
attitudes and convictions of its members - it is. The question is who gave modern public
education and the government the right to decide what these beliefs,
attitudes, values and convictions should and will be? It is completely true that the sum total
of the beliefs, attitudes, convictions and values of any group of people
determines the general and specific form the society takes - the level of
decency, morality, responsibility, and happiness, but also criminality,
immorality, injustice, decadence and decay. It’s not that the psychologists and sociologists are wrong in their
analysis of all this. They are too often very correct in their observations
of existing conditions, but almost always incorrect in their explanation of
underlying causes. They are a complete failure with their purported
solutions and "cures" (look at the modern disaster of public education,
which has been controlled
by educational psychologists for many years now). Science as Man's Salvation, or is it? Their idea is that, up until now, society
has unfolded, largely in negative and harmful ways, because the beliefs,
attitudes, values and convictions of its members were determined either by
pure chance or due to the machinations of unscrupulous members of religions
and governments. This has been largely true. The humanist analysis of
the past is generally not incorrect from within the framework they view it
from. The social engineers have the opinion that this can all be changed for
the better by a "scientific" understanding of how belief, attitudes
and values form, and by their active intervention in controlling how and what
ideas take hold and grow within any society. This is a noble sounding idea, but only in
theory. It hasn't yet and it never will produce positive results. Why?
"Pure science" is always the result of generally curious
individuals who discover for the sake of discovery alone. They, as "pure
scientists", have no affiliation with any purpose, cause or ideal. They
do what they do pretty much because it’s
there to be done. It's fun. It's challenging. But the results of "pure
science" are always taken and used by others, who DO have very specific
purposes, goals, intentions and plans, and these things are not necessarily
what any of us would choose freely on our own if we were completely educated
into the truth of what is going on. As an example, Einstein developed his
ideas and applications of energy, E=mc2, primarily from a pure
love and fascination with the subject. The subject is just data, information,
and related facts. But it took others to make nuclear weapons, and bring the
planet to a point where either the The sociologist and humanist correctly
points out that beliefs, attitudes and behaviors have been manipulated in the
past by devious members of the State and Church, to the harm of us all. What
they fail to notice or mention is that the same type of culprit is always
with us, and always eager and willing to use the latest methods and
techniques to further control the general public. They are with us now,
although well disguised. Behavioral psychology and social engineering may
contain a few lofty and decent notions about "creating a better
tomorrow" and "evolving a humane society for all", but in
actual application, it gets used, and mostly abused, by the same
type nasty folks who have been wreaking havoc on the planet since as far back
as we can look. Plus the subjects of modern psychology,
and sociology, largely based upon Darwinian theories of evolution and the
importance of the environment as the key determining and controlling factor,
are fundamentally flawed, and lead naturally to incorrect theories and
disastrous practices. Modern scientific analysis of "man" has neglected and denied
Man's mind. The subjects themselves, whether used by good or bad
intentioned people, are incomplete and will always result in failed people
and societies. Behavioral Psychology & Psychiatry
as Tools of the Elite All research into these subjects has been conducted
or funded by wealthy corporations, foundations and governments. These
subjects wouldn't exist at all without the tremendous degree of funding given
to them. As subjects of a pure free enterprise system of supply and demand,
they would have disappeared a long time ago because nobody would have paid
for them. They exist only because of incredible subsidization by
forces external to the free and natural market place of supply and demand.
The subjects of psychology,
social engineering, and psychiatry
are TOOLS for those who fund them used to realize their own goals and
purposes. Methods and techniques exist to alter
values, beliefs, and behavior. These are being used extensively by the
government and through the modern public education
system. The educators, philosophers, psychologists and teachers will
deny, usually, that they are doing this, but this is exactly what they are
doing. Some slip from time to time and tell it like it is. It is quite clear
though if you take the time to read their research or professional writings. Part of any theory of behavior modification, values clarification
or outcome-based education
involves the idea of "what do we want the future to be like?" To
decide on how to modify values, beliefs, or behavior, one must first decide
what "outcomes" they want to exist in the future, then what
behaviors are necessary to bring the outcomes about, and finally what values,
beliefs and convictions are necessary to enable or support these. All these
social engineers first establish a very clear idea and model of what they want
the future to be like. Then, starting with the concept of what
they desire the future to be, they work backwards and determine what beliefs,
convictions and attitudes are necessary to support such a future. Once they
have established these beliefs, attitudes and convictions, they then examine
the current beliefs, attitudes and convictions, and work out a plan of how
to get from here, in the present, to there, in the future. Millions of
dollars have been spent on studies related to this idea of controlling the
change of beliefs, attitudes and behavior. It’s been going on for almost 50 years, although usually well hidden from
public view. Public education gives them an almost "closed system",
free from external influences, where they can work their plans and methods.
The public schools are very much an experimental psychology laboratory, and
your children are the guinea pigs. Realize most of what they do is based on theories,
and the theories get tested upon your children in the public schools.
They don't know if their ideas are "right" or "will
work", but that won't stop them from trying. The point is this:
Parents Rights to
Decide Most parents feel that they should have
the right to determine what the future should be for their children. They
should. The parent tries to impart to their children values, morals, ideals,
beliefs and convictions. This is because the parent has decided, whether
actually thinking about it or not, that the life they have lived and
experienced is worthwhile, valuable, and legitimate, and that they will do
their best to transmit a similar life, through their own values and beliefs,
to their children. They have found their values and morals to lead to a
purposeful and fulfilling life. But the modern behavioral psychologist views
this as "brutal totalitarianism" and "forced parental
authority" which undermines the natural decency and morality of the
inquisitive child. They don't believe you have a right to do this, and they
are trying to do all within their power to stop you from doing it. They claim
"science" has proven them right, and as a true believer they will
do whatever is necessary to get their way. I will be honest. I am not a Christian. I
fall nowhere within the right or the left politically. I consider both ends
to be examples of potential totalitarianism (right=fascism and
left=communism; take your pick as they are equally rotten). I don't believe
in God - not at all. But I am also not an atheist, a humanist or a
materialist. I am extremely spiritual, very moral, and above all, believe
that every person should be granted the complete right to choose and believe
whatever they desire with no interference from anyone else. I believe every
person has the right to bring up their children how they choose, and it also
your right to communicate your beliefs and opinions to others in whatever
manner you choose. If the listener accepts them, fine, and if not, that
should also be fine. I do not at all agree that enforced behavior
manipulation, parading as "education" should be allowed anywhere in
our public schools. Modern psychology is an enemy of traditional religions,
as it denies all absolutes, but it is also an enemy of everything decent in
Man, as it also denies Man's inner mental
nature, which is the actual source of Man's creativity, meaning, purpose,
responsibility, intention, will, awareness, decency and morality. Modern psychology also has an interesting
view of religion. They understand it to be the beliefs and feelings one has
as a necessary requirement to come to terms with the absolute magnitude, lack
of control, and ultimate fate we each encounter in life and with the
universe. To them it has to do with "feelings" only, and refers to
no possibility of actuality as far as specific beliefs, dogma and creed go.
They look at it as a "need" like the human organism's need
for food, rest, sex or entertainment, and view the existing details of
any religion as the end result of mutual mental reactions to external forces
which evolved over centuries. They could never understand how various aspects
of Buddhism or Hinduism may actually be the results of centuries of intense
and valid study and experimentation with mental and spiritual aspects of Man
they know absolutely nothing about. To them religion is all delusional and of
the nature of adult fairy tales (which some of it may very well be). They are
happy to try to push out all existing religions which they see as sources of
conflicts, intolerance and authoritarianism, and usher in some new, more
tolerant form of religion which will equally "satisfy" the human
"need" for religion. What they don't ever see is that there are
entire aspects of reality, experience and alternative possibilities for human
consciousness which only are dealt with, explained and understood under
what's called "religion". These things aren't necessarily imaginary
or false, and may have complete legitimate existence, but not to the modern
materialist and "science". But no matter, people should have and
must be guaranteed the right to choose and believe whatever they desire, and
to pass these beliefs and practices on to their children without
interference. In a sense the adult continues to live through their
children, and it's up to them to create their children in whatever form they
choose. Said in another way, people enjoy certain
aspects of their life and it's social organization. They consider these
valid, important, and fulfilling, and they intend to enable the same level of
validity, importance and fulfillment in the lives of their children. This is
done through the passing of ideas and notions about the past, and especially
with beliefs, attitudes and convictions about all manner of things. These
involve culture, heritage, religion, morals, and ethics among other things. The modern behaviorist and educator, or
social scientist and humanist, will point out that unique cultures, heritage,
race, religion and morals have too often acted to oppress and attack others
with conflicting cultures, heritage, race, religion, and morals. They are
completely right. But they offer no workable solution, despite all their
theories and well-promoted lofty intentions. They pretty much attack and tear
down without putting anything positive and substantial back to take the place
of what they destroy. Additionally, they fail completely to ever notice or
mention all the good and positive things which have come out of religion,
culture, heritage, race, and existing morality. To point out a few examples out of many: I
enjoy the beauty of a Hindu poem, the intensity of a Tibetan monk meditating,
Buddha's urgings to observe and verify for yourself, and the notion of
Christ's unwavering unconditional Love. I enjoy Chinese food, the incredible
politeness of the Japanese, the attention to details of the Germans, the
strong family feelings of the Jews, the innocent lack of pretension of the
Scandinavian people, and the friendliness of the Italians. I appreciate the
various things different peoples attach meaning to such as traditions,
clothing, and the unique ways they value and involve themselves with life. I
admire the white race's desire and ability to control the world around him,
the yellow race's lack of desire to do the same, the black's incredible
artistic creativity as displayed in music and dance, and the red race's awe
and respect for nature. There is so much good that has come out of religion,
divergent cultures, the various races, and even governments. I dare say without the Ten Commandments
and the Golden Rule the past 2000 years would have been much worse of
a barbarism that it otherwise had been. They also fail to point out the true
sources of the evils and troubles of any time period, this being - the
few powerful manipulators and controllers who are always there using whatever
means are available to deceive, control, spread chaos and oppress the rest of
us - whether as members of religions, political parties, corporations, or
educational systems. The modern philosopher, humanist, and psychologist
err by conceiving the entirety of religion and allegiances to any group to be
all equally evil and prone to harming others, when in fact, it is usually
only a few well placed really nasty few who actually cause all the
trouble and give the larger subjects or areas a bad name by association. Thus Germans get a bad name from Hitler;
Christians get a bad name from the ruling hierarchy of the Spanish
Inquisition; Americans get a bad name from CIA interference in politics in
South America; Brits get a bad name for the East India Company's control of
opium production and wars with China to keep the peasant population addicted
and the profits rolling in. See, it's almost always only a few making
it bad for everyone else. Because the normal or average German, Christian,
American, or Brit simply wants to be left alone, live their life as they
choose, work, play, and make whatever they want for themselves and others. People like to form into groups, which
have differing attitudes, opinions, concerns, goals, beliefs, attitudes and
values. But instead of encouraging a true tolerance of alternate viewpoints,
modern psychological theories act to destroy the possibility of any
differences at all, and more than not enforce a droll mediocrity of
standardized experience and conformity. Maybe this isn't what they say they
want, or even truly want, but this is the results of their practices,
despite all their arguments and protests. When all is said and done, the
results of their methods fail and do not give the results they originally
envisioned. In fact, too often their results are worse than if they simply
had done nothing at all! We all need to observe results and quit
listening to PR and asserted declarations of truth. Why Modern "Scientific"
Theories of Man Fail Moral relativism has resulted in moral
decay and a feeling amongst young people that "nothing matters",
"why bother", and "it's only my opinion, and its no more
valuable than anyone else's". Despite what they say, and how true what
they say often is, the modern social scientists consistently fail to change
anything for the better when attempting to apply their methods to people and
society. Things get worse, and their interference actually acts to
increase the rate of things getting worse. Why? Without getting into a detailed discussion
of this, let me briefly say that Man at the current level of human
consciousness and spiritual attainment is incapable of understanding, using,
or benefiting by ideas and methods such as moral relativism. It might work
for perfect or near-perfect human beings, but then again, in that case, just
about anything would work. First, there is too much irrationality
(sources of mental and emotional turmoil) still buried deep within us all
which prevents any possibility of "sane" examination and choice of
values, beliefs, convictions and attitudes, much less any consistent
effective personal control of intentional behavior. As an example, try to
quietly sit for 30 minutes and observe the activity of your own mind. Or try
to empty your mind and not think of anything for 10 minutes. Or the next time
you feel depressed, for no reason, just make it go away. The point is that we
have almost no control over the inner landscape of our own minds and
emotions. The modern subjects of psychology and psychology have failed to
understand the magnitude and true
sources for this aspect of Man's irrationality and lack of control,
besides also then failing in any attempt to solve this situation. Their
theories don't adequately explain it, much less address it. The source of much of Man's
"feelings", attitudes and ideas is a veritable cesspool or spiritual
abyss, buried deep within, impervious to detection and observation, and which
constantly acts to "color" and effect every experience of Man's
daily life. This hidden and unknown realm of irrationality is the primary
source of insane intentions, desires, compulsions, hatred, intolerance, and
confusion. Sigmund Freud began looking into this area, but he only scratched
the surface, and theories and methods addressing man's "inner
realm" directly have been largely forgotten under the influence of modern
behaviorism and psychiatry. Research was never carried forward in this
direction within any traditional or established fields of study. No simple
system of "values clarification", OBE, drugging, behavioral
engineering, social manipulation or government can or will work when this
factor in Man remains unhandled. It's like trying to put a Band-Aid on a
10" gash which actually requires 35 stitches, antibiotics and much more
involved medical treatment. Second, systems such as "values
clarification" assume we all have easy and ready access to accurate
facts and information. This is completely absurd. Since the government is
behind the entire behavioral approach to education, you'd better realize that
any "data", "facts" or "information" you get to
apply in your values clarification exercises or situation analysis has
probably been spoon fed to you. There is so much false information out there
- about economics, health, the mind, the environment, nutrition, medicine, people, money,
the government, politics and religion. Of course they want you to have a
"free choice" in a "democratic" society because they are
providing the only information about the options available to you. Democracy, defined as decisions by and for
the majority of the people, is the perfect system for any society where
beliefs, attitudes and convictions are effectively controlled by some hidden
power, whether the government, corporate entities, or religion. The people
are spoon fed the "information" necessary to mold their attitudes
and beliefs, and then they happily and in a very deluded manner,
"vote" and decide "freely" upon their future. It's a
complete delusion. Realize this is why the As with anything in the government,
whatever you see to exist at any moment is most likely only the tip of the
iceberg, because much of their studies are confidential, protected by the
National Security Act, and you only have access to what they have allowed
you to have access to. As an example, if they have a Stealth bomber, and
we know about that, lord knows what they have that we don't know
about! (UFOs?) The CIA, as part of the government, conducted illegal and
hidden mind control experiments on unknowing American public in the 50's and
60's. Do you really think they stopped? What they stopped was their careless
methods and leaving traceable evidence. Who knows what levels of technical
expertise they have achieved with brain microchip implants and other forms of
mind control. Again, the only thing they have stopped doing is getting
caught. Concern With Emotions and Feelings Modern educational theories almost always
appeal to the emotions. How do you feel about that? What's your feeling
on abortion? What's your feeling on your parents divorce? What would
you feel if your brother were brutally murdered? What do you feel
when I say each word? Rain Forest? Homosexual? Mom? We need to all feel
more. These, and similar questions, are part and parcel to OBE, values
clarification and behavioral manipulation. What does this have to do with
learning to read, spell, study, develop skills, or excel at anything? It
doesn't. Emotions and feelings have nothing to do with
reason or analytical thought. They have nothing to do with personal control,
choice, responsibility and self-determinism. They have nothing to do with
observing situations, collecting facts and making sane or constructive
decisions. They have nothing to do with controlling one's behavior and
actions. Emotions, too often, come from the earlier mentioned dark and
unconscious place hidden deep within us all. They can, at times, seem to
erupt from the depths of our being. They are too often irrational, or not
germane to the situation at hand. But emotions are routinely appealed to in
modern psychological procedures. Why? Because feelings and emotions represent
the raw, unreasoned gut reaction to stimuli - to the behavioral psychologist
anyway. Feelings represent your immediate, pre-conscious, unreasoning
response to any stimuli. It's a direct index, to them, of how you experience
something. A person should be a mind in control,
with reason and analytical ability in the driver's seat. The emotions are
often simply the body-mind reaction to events, some positive, some negative,
but also, emotional content can erupt from the depths of one's being, having
no apparent relationship to the current external environment. Feelings are
not dependable "data" for making decisions. Ideas and attitudes can
also be largely determined or at least colored by this invisible source of
human error within us all. Examples such as paranoia for no reason, fear of
speaking in public, or anxiety over something which holds no actual threat or
danger exhibit this. There are many more as life is filled with them. Modern
psychological and psychiatric theories have failed to address this and it's
actual causes and solutions. Also emotions can be exaggerated for the
situation at hand. Simply, appealing to emotions and how one feels
is begging to open the door to illogic, and irrationality. Feelings are what happens to you,
as an effect. Thought and reason determine what you do as a source
of decision and as a cause upon things outside yourself. Emotions are
energies coming in at you, whereas rationality involves energies you
send out to others and to the environment. Cause is sending out. That's part and
parcel with responsibility, creativity and action. Effect is coming in, what happens
to you and involves modern psychology's inane preoccupation with feelings and
"experience" (i.e. What happens to me? How do I feel?
Is this experience valuable? Let's work to achieve quality experiences.
Life in it's best form is positive mutual experience...) Modern psychology is concerned to the
point of absurdity with one's "response", "reaction to"
and "experience" with and to life. It's all from the angle of
"how you are the effect of something". This approach, which
is a basic theoretical and ideological underpinning of all their systems of
thought, puts a certain spin on everything they do. In a nutshell, Man is
viewed as an object of effect, a point upon which forces act, a
thing to be moved and determined by powers other than himself. Even every
separate unique experience is viewed as a stimuli which acts upon the
human organism forcing him to modify his thoughts, attitudes, beliefs,
values and behavior. Man as Responsible and at Cause The above mentioned viewpoint is opposite
to, contradictory to, and incompatible with any viewpoint of Man as a creative,
causative, and responsible entity. This is one of modern psychology's
ideological major flaws and weaknesses. It also explains why modern
psychological theories can and never will get the results they imagine,
despite all their humanistic rhetoric and humane posturing. It ultimately
denies and prevents causative thought, and responsible self-determined
actions. Behavioral psychology theoretically denies these things in Man,
things which are actually capabilities and potentials of Man's mind. Modern psychology
stopped dealing with the mind a long time ago. The theories and practices of modern
psychology and psychiatry inherently deny any original power to act,
creativity or causal ability in It's not that the observations of
the modern psychologists aren't correct - they are pretty much often right
about that. Man does have problems with life and his own mind. Man has
been a tyrant throughout most of his history, as a group and as individuals.
But this was not only due to the extant beliefs, attitudes, values and
convictions of the times. The modern behavioral psychologist believes this
to be true, and assumes that if he simply changes man's beliefs, attitudes,
values and convictions, that everything will turn out just dandy. He has
failed completely to recognize various intensely uncontrollable, irrational
and powerfully negative aspects of Man's mind, which function to prevent any
true evolution to or attainment of better states of personal existence and
organizations of society. It was this aspect of Man that has caused,
is causing now, and will cause in the future all insanity, criminality,
hatred, failure and unhappiness - at least until it is adequately confronted,
addressed and dealt with in an effective manner. Without observing and
recognizing this aspect of Man and his mind, the modern psychologists
naturally never attempt to deal with it or correct the source of it. Instead,
they endlessly manipulate and control thought and behavior, using overt or
covert force in the attempt to achieve their aims. Man can come up with new political
systems, "psychological theories", "social sciences",
beliefs, values and convictions until the end of time, but as long as man's
quite severe underlying spiritual (i.e. mental) problems remain unseen and
unhandled, all Man's attempts at bringing about a better world will fail. See, it's not the world that's the
problem. It's not the "social setup" that's the problem. It's not
the political entity that's the problem. It's not some religion that's the
problem. It's not even so much the beliefs, attitudes and values which are
the problems, at least not at the most fundamental level. It's Man himself
who is the problem. He carries around with him, everywhere he goes, the
blueprint for his own destruction. It's intricate, powerful, hidden and
always ready to subvert every decent intention, plan or activity. This
blueprint is not formed from current environmental effects upon the organism,
and the conceptual framework of the behaviorists and psychiatrists are
insufficient to detect, explain or solve this problem. The best explanation
of it is in the book Dianetics,
by L.Ron Hubbard. Call it the unconscious mind, or
collective unconscious, or Freudian Id, or whatever you want. None of these succeed
at fully delineating and understanding the nature, complexity, or power of
this invisible, but continual source of human failure and misery. So long as this
remains, so will fail every superficial "scientific", philosophical
or intellectual abstract system which attempts to "fix" Man and his
societies. Every system attempts to solve the problem by enforcing some
external social structure or set of beliefs upon Until it is studied, understood, and
solved, for every single human being (or at least enough to make a
difference), every enforced external structure or system will fail. In fact,
the more control that is exerted, the worse it always gets. Surprisingly,
once this source of human aberration and irrationality is addressed and
corrected, the need for systems such as "modern psychology" and
"psychiatry" will disappear. Both of these are attempts to explain
and solve something which each only views from a very limited, biased and
superficial angle. These deal largely with symptoms, endlessly naming
negative conditions with life or a mind, and constructing complex theories
which remain at a superficial level of understanding causes while pretending
to deal with fundamentals and facts. Plus, they are linked much too closely
with profit motives (drug companies - psychiatry) and power (governments -
behavioral engineering), and they aren't necessarily even really trying to do
what they say they are trying to do - solve Man so as to "help" the
individual human being. Intellectual Ability and Abstract
Thinking The implementation and application of
behavior modification techniques in the schools has taken attention away from
actual intellectual and cognitive development. This further confuses things
because intellectual development aids and contributes to the use of reason,
analytical ability, observational ability and thinking (instead of depending
on "feelings"). The modern teacher is much more apt though, because
this is how they have been taught, to ask the student how he
"feels" about something, instead of what he "thinks"
about something. Consulting "feelings", instead of thought, is a
direct invitation to open the doors of irrationality. There is such a thing
as intuition, but this is not what the "feelings" of modern
psychology refers to. The acknowledgment and development of Man's capacity
for conceptual thought and analytical reasoning helps minimize the effects
and power of the negative unconscious aspects of Man mentioned earlier. So,
modern psychological practices act to diminish the ability to think, and also
appeal more to Man's unconscious and largely undependable realm of
"feelings" and emotions. Ironically, the "Age of Reason"
is leading directly to the "Age of Unreason". As I have a tendency to do, I have
digressed again. I shall return to the original point of this paper. Who
should decide what the future should be, and therefore, who should decide the
values, beliefs and attitudes of our children? Government Decides If You Don't If you don't demand the right to do it,
the government will do it for you, and they will do it in a way which results
in immorality, mental dullness, educational failures, and increasing decadence.
It has gotten so bad in the public schools that your only chance to relay the
ideas you want to your children is to take them out of the public school
system. The government, in alliance with supposed
"professionals" in the fields of behavioral psychology, sociology
and psychiatry, has decided on a pre-planned future, and they are using the
public education system and the funding of private education to implement
their practices to alter values, belief, conviction and behavior. They
believe their "scientific" analysis and "discoveries"
about people and society can be used to usher in a wonderful new world order
of "peace", "harmony" and "grand human
achievement". They are terribly wrong. But they won't be dissuaded, they
aren't open to honest perception or observation, and they intend to keep on
right along the way they are going. Even after the world is an
ultra-controlled, decadent and meaningless menagerie of hedonistic personal
"experiences", they will still conceive themselves to be right,
having done the best they could with what they had to work with. Modern
psychological theories are based upon the biological and genetic theories of Beliefs, convictions, values and attitudes
will exist and change regardless whether done accidentally or intentionally.
Relay the values and beliefs to your children and others which you think
matter, and do everything you can to get the government and modern
education out of the belief business. Behind it all, there are those who
conceive themselves to know better than you, and who will gladly take control
of the belief machinery if you let them. It's not even a matter whether they are
right and you are wrong, or vice versa. The point is that it is up to
each of us, and each of us alone, to determine what beliefs we choose
to support, and which we choose to pass along to our children and associates.
Government should support and guarantee that right for all of
us, and nothing more, but instead, the government is acting to
originate, promote and instill specific beliefs into the culture, in an
attempt to bring about a new and different future society. Elitism and Authorities They believe they are right, and as with
all people who believe they are right, they have no compunctions about doing
for and to you whatever is necessary for them to bring about their envisioned
perfect new order of things. The modern humanists and materialists (as
psychologists, social engineers and psychiatrists) are actually doing the
very same thing they so readily accuse many past religions and monarchs of
doing, things which they say they truly detest - enforcing their own unique
and limited belief systems on others from a position of imagined superiority.
It is meaningless that they now do this from a position of
"science". The effects are the same - oppression, force, and harm
to humanity. It's also meaningless that they say they have decent intentions
- Hitler said the same thing; so did Stalin; and so did Chairman Mao.
Millions of people suffered and died, and in the end what the elitists
dreamed of never came into existence, largely because they possessed unreal
and stupid notions in the first place. The goals and practices of modern
government, humanism, social psychology and psychiatry are basically
functioning in the same way. Whatever form their intentions and plans
actually come to take will be some distorted and devolved example of further
human depravity. They aren't any smarter than you,
and they shouldn't be allowed to do this. But that's really the problem with
any elitist and "authority" - they believe they are smarter,
assume they know best, and have the right to do whatever they choose, despite
your disagreement and unwillingness. They conceive you to be incapable of
making a correct and knowledgeable decision, and they jump right in to do it
for you. They believe once things change, and you see and experience the
wonders of their brave new world, that we will all happily cheer them on for
the great things they have done. So they justify the means to their imagined
future end, just as have all dictators and forces of evil who have ever
coerced, deceived or harmed anyone, in their attempt to realize their
supposed lofty ideal of social, political or religious perfection (i.e.
nazism, fascism, communism, socialism, and now democracy). Summary You deserve to have the right to create
any future you want, by deciding upon the attitudes, beliefs, values and
convictions of your children and associates, but you will have to fight against those who would happily make
those decisions for you. They have always been around sowing their mischief.
They are here now. Differing alternatives should be offered
and clearly explained to you. You should have the right to be told if a
school practices behavior modification methods, how so, what their intended
goals are, and to then choose whether to enroll your children in the
school. You should have the right to enroll them in another public school
which doesn't practice behavioral methods if you so desire. That
would be actual legitimate "freedom of choice". But you are not
given that choice. Public schooling is a one-size-fits-all system, and either
you accept what's available or you must pay for an alternative education
elsewhere. Since many of us can't afford the alternatives, we are basically
stuck with public education for our children. Ultimately it will come to be a
one-size-fits-all system for the country and the entire planet. Keep in mind
they are using the education system to bring about a new future. There won't
be any choice there either - I imagine it will be accept the total social
control or report to the euthanasia "clinic". This is not freedom, or democracy,
no matter how these slick advertising specialists package and promote it. It is
forced belief manipulation, and to make matters worse, we all have to pay
property taxes to support them in their efforts to control and direct the
future beliefs, attitudes and values of our children, whether we agree with
what they are doing or not. Modern materialism and the
"scientific" subjects of psychology and psychiatry are, in fact,
intricate belief systems and structures of thought comprising tangible ideologies and
orthodoxies. As such they are simply just like any past or present religion,
because they contain theories and beliefs about Man, the universe, and Man's
relationship to the universe around him. The psychiatrists, psychologists and
humanists believe them as much as any religious fanatic believed what he
believed. Really, for all practical purposes, these function just as did the
religions of the past which they claim to detest so much. The State should
not support any religion or unique system of belief about Man and the
universe, whether disguised as "science" or otherwise. But it does.
It supports materialism, modern psychology, psychiatry and social planning,
all of which are results of the application of "science" to the the
problems of people and societies (i.e. the social sciences - which aren't
actually "sciences" at all). For more on exactly how and why "science" has
failed, see here. |
