The
By:
Paula Demers
In
1961, the Kennedy administration ordered a "Top Secret" study to
determine what problems the
In
the same year that this "Top Secret" study was called, 1961, The
Department of State put out a publication (#7277) called "Freedom from
War, The United States Program for a General and Complete Disarmament in a
Peaceful World". This publication describes a three step program to disarm
the American military, shut down bases and have one military under the United
Nations. This "military" would be the world-wide police force to be
used as "peace keepers" throughout the world. The plan would include
that "all weapons of mass destruction" be eliminated with the
exception of "those required for a United Nations Peace Force" (page
12, paragraph one). In order to "keep the peace, all states will reaffirm
their obligations under the UN Charter to refrain from the threat of use of any
type armed force" (page 16, paragraph eight) To support the UN Charter,
the average citizen will need to be disarmed; so they cannot defend themselves
against these "peace keepers". You don't have to watch much news to
see that today, the UN forces are used as "peace keepers" throughout
the world, disarming people so they can't defend themselves against oppressive
governments. To quote Sarah Brady, Chair of Handgun control, Inc. "Our
Task of creating a socialist
I
also want to point out the interesting things that happened in the mid 1960's:
The protests against the war in
In
1963, the same year as the selection of specialists for this "Top
Secret" study, President John F. Kennedy made an astounding statement. On
November 13, while speaking at Columbus University, Pres. Kennedy stated,
"The high office of the President of the United States of America has been
used to forment a plot to destroy America's freedom, and before I leave office,
I must inform the citizens of their plight! Ten days later, President John F.
Kennedy was shot and killed.
The
study was completed in 1966. President Johnson gave the order that the report
was never to be released, due to the nature of the conclusions reached. The
purpose of this Report was to see what it would take to bring the
To
quote directly from the cover letter of this report: (paragraph three)
"Because of the unusual circumstances surrounding the establishment of
this Group, and in view of the nature of its finding, we do not recommend that
this Report be released for publication...such actions would not be in the
PUBLIC INTEREST (emphasis mine)...a lay reader, unexposed to the exigencies of
higher political or military responsibility, will misconstrue the purpose of
this project, and the intent... We urge that the circulation of the Report be
closely restricted to those whose responsibilities require that they be
apprised of its contents..." Those who responsibilities require they know?
Would this be the people who will be working to bring us into a New World
Order?
One
man involved in the study elected to release it to the general public. He did
it at great risk to himself using the name John Doe. Mr. Doe must have believed
the American people were smart enough to decide for themselves if they wanted
to loose their freedom to a "golden age of peace". After John Doe
released the information, the Establishment renounced it saying it was a hoax.
There are not many copies of this Report left. Some large libraries have copies
and it would be worth the effort to check it out. This in itself would be proof
it is not a hoax.
There
are very interesting terms used and repeated throughout the report. Some of
these include "general condition of peace", "functions of
war", "change social structure", "problems of peace",
"transition of world peace", replacing the "function of
war", "saving the species" (man), "disarmament
transition", "social control", "selective population
control", "gross population control" and "loss of national
sovereignty".
The
stated purpose of this Report (taken from the first paragraph of the cover
letter) is: to consider the problems involved in the contingency of a
transition to a general condition of peace, and to recommend procedures for
dealing with this contingency. “We will do our best to capture the basic
message in this report. This 34 page report basically deals with the
"functions of War" and how to replace those "functions"
with other options. So there can be peace and the "species" (man) can
survive.
THE
IRON MOUNTAIN REPORT
The
introduction of this Report shows some interesting observations this group came
up with during their 2 1/2 year study. If there came a "condition of world
peace" (paragraph three) it would change the social structures of all the
nations of the world. There is nothing that has happened to compare with the
change that would occur in such an instance. They point out that there would be
consequences to peace. Not just the economy, but every other aspect of life
would be touched also. It would touch the "political, sociological,
cultural, and ecological" aspects. The reason they included these aspects
in their study is that the world (at that time) was totally unprepared to cover
all the demands that would come in these areas in such a situation of peace.
They conclude that at the end of the report they give their recommendations for
what they believe to be a "practical and necessary course of action."
(paragraph six)
These
15 experts set you straight in the first section that they are doing to be
totally objective in their study. (Section one, paragraph five) They made a
"continuously self-conscious effort" to keep the values of
"good" and "bad". They admit that it wasn't easy, but as
far as they could tell, it had never been done before. The previous studies for
peace had taken certain things into consideration:"...the importance of
human life, the superiority of democratic institutions, the greatest 'good' for
the greatest number, the 'dignity' of the individual, the desirability of
maximum healthier and longevity,” These experts did not. Instead they attempted
to "....apply the standards of physical science...." and go on to
quote Whitehead who said, "...ignores all judgments of value; for
instance, all esthetics and moral judgments."
In
other words, people the idea of human rights, and the value of human life are
not at all taken into consideration in the putting together of the Report. They
took their assignment, and decided how they could take care of all the problems
without considering the people involved. In this report, as you will see, human
beings are being brought down to the level of herds of animals.
Section
four is interesting. (War and Peace as Social Systems). They point out that
wars are not "caused" because of international conflicts of interest.
(paragraph seven). They further comment that "...war-making, active or
contemplated, is a matter of life and death on the greatest scale subject to
social control..." In paragraph six of this same section, they comment
that the "threats" against the "national interest" are
created or accelerated to "meet the changing needs of the war
system". This will be in more detail in the next section, where they
discuss the "Functions of War". (Section five) for each section,
along with their "Substitutes for the Functions of War (Section six). We
will include booth the "functions" and the "substitutes"
under each heading.
FUNCTION
OF WAR / SUBSTITUTES FOR THE FUNCTIONS OF WAR
They
go into great detail on the "Functions of War" (Section five) and the
"Substitutes for the Functions of War" (Section six). The areas
covered are: economic, political, sociological, ecological, cultural and
scientific. These areas are all affected by the "functions of war" so
they will have to find "substitutes for the functions of war" in
order to have peace.
ECONOMIC
One
"function of war" is that it uses organized violence to defend or
advance "national interest". They believe it is necessary for a
military establishment to "create a need for its unique powers"
(Section five, paragraph two)
Another
major "function of war" is that it produces waste. This waste is a
means to control surpluses. It also produces jobs and industrial advancement.
War, basically, stimulates the economy. Paragraph eight states, "It is,
and has been the essential economic stabilizer of modern societies."
In
section six, they come up with options that can replace war. They have two
criteria: they must be wasteful, and must operate outside the normal supply and
demand system. They make a list of social welfare programs, such as health and
housing. But they comment that there is a weakness in changing the money form
the military spending to social-welfare. Unless it was run like the military,
"subject to arbitrary control". (paragraph 12) This control would
come in the form of building (public housing--medical centers) that can be
accelerated or stopped, depending on what it would take to create a stable
economy. Another option would be a series of "giant space research
programs". (paragraph 13)
POLITICAL
One
"function of war" in the political sense, is that war is
"virtually synonymous with nationhood" (paragraph two) War has been
essential for nations to exist independently. So, with "peace",
nations lose their national sovereignty.
So
a "substitute for the function of war" politically would have to come
up with something that would be compatible with no national sovereignty.
Nations can still exist in the "administrative sense" (paragraph
two). But there would have to be institutions, such as a "
One
of the things considered was generating a type of space enemy. They acknowledge
that, "...most ambitious and unrealistic space project cannot of itself
generate a believable eternal menace...."(paragraph seven) Even the
"flying saucer instances" were not encouraging enough to be used to
unite "....mankind against the danger of destruction by 'creatures' from
other planets...."
An
effective substitute for war would require "alternate enemies".
(paragraph seven) They go on to say that a "gross pollution of the
environment" could eventually replace the mass destruction by nuclear
weapons, as a "threat to the survival of the species", (meaning
humans). In paragraph eight, they go on to say that "...Poisoning of the
air, and the principles sources of food and water supply, is already well
advanced". This, at first glance, would seem to be promising. But they go
on to say, "...by present indications it will be a generation to a generation
and a half before environmental pollution, however severe, will be sufficiently
menacing, on a global scale....." In other words, pollution can offer a
solution to get rid of the population that nuclear war does; and it's already
being done, but it would take a generation to a generation and a half to
accomplish the desired goal. They go on to explain that the rate of population
could be "increased selectively". (paragraph nine) If there was a
"modifying of existing programs" that deter the pollution, it could
speed up the process to make this solution credible sooner.
Paragraph
ten stresses the fact that even though some of the alternate enemies mentioned
may seem unlikely, they are sure that one must be found. It must be of
"...credible quality and magnitude, if a transition to peace is ever to
come without social disintegration. Plain English? There must be some type of
"disaster" found that will unite the nations to come under one roof.
SOCIOLOGICAL
The
"function of war" in this section is, in the author of this report's
opinion, an insult to human intelligence. In the third paragraph, they discuss
the fact that military service has a "patriotic" priority in society.
This as an idea needs to be "maintained for its own sake". It can be
used as a "...control device over the hostile, nihilistic, and potential
unsettling elements of society in transition, (meaning, though they don't use
the term, people) the draft can again be defended, and quite convincingly, as a
'military' necessity." They go on in the fourth paragraph that the
"...armed forces in every civilization have provided....state-supported
haven .....for the 'unemployable'..." They go on to comment that a
replacement for this "function of war" must "involve a real risk
of personal destruction..." If the substitute doesn't provide a believable
life and death threat, it will not serve the "...socially organizing
function of war." (paragraph 12)
In
the "substitution for the function of war" there were two critical
classifications. In order for there to be a stable society in a world of peace,
the following tow criteria would be needed: an effective substitute for
military institutions that neutralize destabilizing social elements"
(which means neutralize anti-social people) This would be essential for
"social control", and a credible motivational surrogate for war that
can insure social cohesiveness", which would be the basic way to adapt
human drives to what the society needs. (paragraph one)
One
possible solution to control "potential enemies of society"
(paragraph six) would be to reintroduce slavery. They asserted that the
"traditional association of slavery" should not blind us to
"...its adaptability to advanced forms of social organization..."
They acknowledge that the "Western moral and economic values" do not
line up with slavery. But it is possible to develop a "....sophisticated
form of slavery..." that may "...be an absolute prerequisite for
social control in a world of peace..." They maintain that the first
"logical" step would be the "adoption of some form of
'universal' military service."
In
paragraph seven, they comment that the "'alternate enemy' must imply a
more immediate, tangible, and indirectly felt threat of destruction." This
enemy must justify taking and paying a "blood price" in the wide area
of human concern. They go on into paragraph eight to say,
"...inconsiderable actual sacrifice of life; the construction of an
up-to-date mythological or religious structure for this purpose would present
difficulties in our era, certainly be considered." They go on to discuss
the development of "blood games" (paragraph nine) to effectively
control individual aggressive impulses. To be realistic, a ritual of this type
might be "socialized" like the Spanish Inquisition and the "witch
trials of other periods". The purposes would be for "social
purification", and "State security". Though this type of thing
is doubtful, it is "...considerable less fanciful than the wishful notion
of many peace planners that a lasting condition of peace can be brought about
without the most painstaking examination of every possible surrogate for the
essential functions of war." They considered this, "in a sense"
the quest for "William Jame's 'moral equivalent of war'."
ECOLOGICAL
This
"function of war" is put in a way very degrading to man. It starts
out in paragraph one with, "Man, like all other animals". Man is
brought down to the level of beasts. They go on to comment that, "To
forestall the inevitable historical cycles of inadequate food supply, post-
Neolithic man destroys surplus members of his own species by organized
warfare." It gets better in paragraph two, where man is compared "in
a limited degree" with rats. This is because they kill their own kind.
One
of the "functions of war" they state, has "...served to help
assure the (survival) of the human species." (paragraph three) They go on
to say that in nature, it is survival of the fittest; the "inferior"
disappear. With war, this function is reversed, because those who fight and die
during wars, are "in general its (its meaning man) biologically stronger
members." In paragraph six, they state: "Conventional methods of
warfare would almost surely prove inadequate, in this event, to reduce the
consuming population to a level consistent with survival of the species."
Species, of course meaning man. So conventional warfare may not be able to kill
enough people. They go on to say (paragraph seven) that, "The second
relevant factor is the efficiency of modern methods of mass destruction. Even
if their use is not required to meet a world population crisis, they offer,
perhaps paradoxically, the first opportunity in the history of man to halt the
regressive genetic effects of natural selection by war."
They
have some interesting ideas for "substitutes for the functions of
war". Since war has shortcomings as a way for "selective population
control", they believe that coming up with substitutes for this function
“should be comparatively simple". (paragraph one) They believe that even
though war has not "been genetically progressive", it cannot be
fairly faulted as a "system of gross population control to preserve the
species".
They
believe to have a "universal requirement" for procreation be limited
to "artificial insemination "would be fully adequate substitute
control for population levels". Conception and embryonic growth would take
place under laboratory conditions. This type of "reproductive system"
would have the advantage of "being susceptible of direct eugenic management".
(Sounds like a "Brave New World" to me.) When this report was
written, steps to have "total control of conception with a variant of the
ubiquitous 'pill', via water supplies or certain essential foodstuffs, off set
by a controlled 'antidote'" was already being developed: by teams of
experimental biologists in Massachusetts, Michigan, and California, Mexico and
the U.S.S.R. (paragraph four)
This
solution, they realize, cannot come about a substitute for war while there is
still war. The reason? "...excess population is war material."
(paragraph five) As long as there is even "a remote possibility of
war" societies "must maintain a supportable population" even if
it affects the economy.
CULTURAL
AND SCIENTIFIC
The
"function of war" wouldn't make too much difference in the area of
art. They do believe that it has a role "...as the fundamental determinant
of culture values." (paragraph two) Right now art shows "...The
exaltation of bravery, the willingness to kill and risk death in tribal
warfare".
The
"function of war" concerning science is a different story. What
motivates the development of science on all levels.
A
"substitution for the function of war" for art would simply be for
art to change. It could be used as previously "in a few primitive
peace-oriented system". (paragraph three) Art would be
"reassigned" to "...decoration, entertainment, or ply...” it
would be "entirely free of the burden of expressing the sociomoral values
and conflicts of a war-oriented society..."
In
science a "substitution for the function of war" could be to go into
a "giant space research program" (paragraph four) They have found, if
all war threats were to end tomorrow, the quest for scientific knowledge could
go forward, without slowing down for "perhaps two decades".
(paragraph five) There are many "unresolved" social issues that can
be researched and dealt with.
OTHER
We
have combined section's five and six to show you that what the
"experts" said the "functions of war" are in our society
along with some of their "substitutions for the functions of war".
Section five ended with some extra comments that we will summarize here.
They
consider war a "general social release" (paragraph two) It provides
"the release and redistribution of undifferentiated tensions". In
other words, a type of therapy. It is a "generational stabilizer"
(paragraph three) that enables the "deteriorating older generation"
to "maintain control of the younger, destroying it if necessary". It
clears ideology. It is a basis for international understanding.
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS
Since
war is not a "political issue" but used as a means of control, if an
"era of peace" were to come, there would have to be drastic changes.
Section Seven gives the "bottom line".
War
has provided a dependable system to maintain economies. Any substitute would
have to be able to take the place of what war does to maintain economies. There
would have to be a way to take care of the "waste" war does that will
permit it to be independent of the normal supply and demand economy. It must be
subject to "arbitrary political control". (paragraph
three-Substitutes for Functions of War: Criteria)
In
the political aspect, war has been the foundation for a stable government.
Political authority is accepted. War has made it able "to maintain
necessary class distinctions". It also ensures the "subordination of
the citizen to the state" though the concept of nationhood. (paragraph
three, functions of war) The substitute for war must make it so an external
menace would require people to accept the political authority.
The
sociological function has been able to control dangerous social dissidence and
destructive tendencies. It has been able to motivate human behavior with social
allegiance. To replace this, a credible omnipresent and understood fear of
personal destruction must be generated. This fear must be big enough to
transcend the value of an individual human to the greater good of the whole.
The
ecological function has been used to maintain a balance between gross human
population and the supplies available for its survival. The substitute must
ensure the survival of the species, man.
SUBSTITUTES
FOR THE FUNCTIONS OF WAR: MODELS
Here
are a few examples these "experts" came up with in order to replace
some of the functions of war. The economic function can be replaced with an in
depth social-welfare program. This program can be directed towards the
improvement of the conditions of human life. An unreachable space research
program is another option. [Think of President W. Bush's new space endeavors.]
Disarmament inspection system with variants of such a system.
The
political function can be an omnipresent (virtually omnipotent) international
police force. There should be an established and recognized extraterrestrial
menace. They recommend massive global and environmental pollution. They even
suggest fictitious alternate enemies.
The
sociological function (they call the Control function) can be programs derived
from using the Peace Corps as a model. Slavery in a modern, sophisticated form
is another option. A motivational function to get control can be intensified
environmental pollution. Also, making new religious or other mythologies.
Socially oriented blood games are another option.
Since
war isn't choosey on who dies, the ecological function can be a comprehensive
program of applied eugenics. (Plain English: breeding superior races)
I
am going to end the summary of this report here. Yes, there is much more in the
report, but I believe you get the jest of it. I am going on to bring this
report into what is happening today.
ARE
THE RECOMMENDATIONS BEING FOLLOWED?
This
report was concluded in 1966. President Kennedy was shot before he could
explain what he was talking about at
THE
HERD
I
found it very interesting that these "experts" took all moral issues
out of their evaluations. Man was brought down to the level of animals, like a
herd of cattle that needed to have decided what was best for the greater good
of the herd. Who would have to be slaughtered and who could be used to increase
the herd? What could be done to get rid of the excess members of the herd? What
about the potentially "criminal" cattle that would not go with what
the owners decided would be best?
This
Report made us to be pawns that have been used to benefit the elite. Great
study and care was taken as what to do to re-condition these pawns to a whole
different type of thinking. These pawns that have been conditioned so long to
think one way. Though the types of things I will be discussing are happening
all over the world, I will be mainly talking about
POPULATION
CONTROL
Since
the legalizing of abortion, over twenty years ago, there have been over 36
million Americans murdered before they could be born. That is more Americans
than have died in all the conflicts
For
Desert Storm, our soldiers had to have shots to "protect them against
chemical warfare". These shots were the germs of botchulism and amtrex
[sic]. Since then over 7000 of our best service men have died.
Euthanasia
and the "right to die with dignity" are being pushed so the
"quality of life" can be improved.
Extermination
camps are being built to do away with "undesirables".
[Read
the articles on FEMA.]
AIDS
is a government made disease that the spread of it is encouraged by our
government.
GLOBAL
PEACE KEEPERS
The
United Nations (UN) has a military that goes around the world as "peace
keepers". The members of the UN forces come from all countries. These
"peace keepers" are also stationed in the
The
Racism
is being pushed over the media and though the government. Should riots develop,
as in other countries, we will need a "peace keeping" force in the
NEW
RELIGIONS? BLOOD SACRIFICES?
The
New Age will be the only acceptable religion of the NWO. It is everything
against Christianity and has infiltrated every area of our lives.
Satanism
and other Occult religions are already having ritual human sacrifices.
EXTRATERRESTRIAL
ENEMY?
When
this was written, over 30 years ago they acknowledged that this would be hard
to convince the people of. Even with the UFO sightings that had already been
put out. What has happened in the past 30 years?
Well,
there have been "alien abductions", and many more UFO sightings. To
top it off, there are UFO clubs where people who have "seen aliens"
or "been abducted" can get together for conventions.
To
top that off, we have had over 25 years of Star Trek, which has enforced a one
world government. Throughout both series and the movies they have the "New
Age" philosophy. (New Age will be the only philosophy accepted by the
NWO.) These folks have all kinds of experience with various races on other
planets.
Star
Wars has also conditioned people to believe in a "galaxy far, far
away". These reinforce extra terrestrial life on other planets. The two
movies, "V" and "V the Final Battle" and then the series
shows and invasion from another planet. The movie "Alien" shows this
also. The world would have to unite, should the "movies and television
programs" come to life with a "real" enemy.
ENVIRONMENT
There
is not scientific evidence available to prove all the environmental problems
our government it trying to push on us. There is no such problem as
"global warming" for example. But, people such as Vice President Gore
and "NWO Lieutenant" Rockefeller are coming out with books that if we
don't unite as a world, to work on the environmental problems, we will not
survive. (Fictitious Enemy?)
MORE
FICTITIOUS ENEMIES
It
is interesting that the media, with the help of the government, is coming up
with all these "potentially dangerous" groups of people? These
extremist groups, such as Christians, Militia members, talk show hosts, right
wing radicals, conservatives etc., are being mentioned regularly as
"potential terrorists". Between this and the racism the government is
pushing, it will make it easy for them to call a police state, and round up all
the people who disagree with them. Those considered to be "enemies of the
state".
SLAVE
LABOR
Anyone
on welfare is already a slave to the government. They are working on
legislation where these people will have to work for their benefits. After
1996, (around May) these benefits will not come in the form of cash or food
stamps. There will be a debit card. This will stop "welfare fraud"
and give the government more control over its welfare slaves.
There
are also several labor camps built, ready to activate. These labor camps will
be for strong prisoners who are considered "dissidents".
GENETIC
EXPERIMENTS
These
experiments are already done on aborted babies. Thanks to a bill signed into
law by Pres. Clinton to support fetal experiments.
What
many folks don't know about are the bio-spheres being built in the mountains.
(The two I know about are, in
[Read
the article on the worldwide U.N. biospheres.]
There
are also concentration camps built that have "storage facilities" for
human organs. These camps will be used for genetic experiments.
IN
CLOSING
I
would like to comment that in all the reports this author has done, and all the
information I have read,
I'm
sure our founding fathers are "spinning in their graves" as they
watch us give up with out a fight what they fought and died for without a
fight.
NOW
IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD MEN TO COME TO THE AID OF THEIR COUNTRY!
Copyright
1998 PropheZine - Bob Lally
From
the editor of Wisdom and Freedom:
The
Wisdom
and Freedom produced by WORLD NEWSSTAND Copyright © 1999. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.