|
"Woe to
you, ye perverted in heart, who are watchful to obtain an accurate knowledge of
evil, and to discover terrors. No one shall assist you." — The Book of Enoch, Chapter XCIX: 6 |
There are many who would argue there is no
such thing as a "unifying conspiracy", claiming that history is merely
a record of the random path of evolution, the development of civilization into
the "post-modern" era of industrial socialism. An excellent
exposition on this theme is the book, Who
Rules America Now? (1983) by G. William Domhoff,
professor of sociology and psychology, upon whom I leaned rather heavily when
writing The Last Chuckle
In Professor Domhoff's
own words, it was his purpose to...
"... present
systematic evidence that suggests there is a social upper class in the United
States that is a ruling class by virtue of its dominant role in the economy and
government. It will be shown that this ruling class is socially cohesive, has a
basis in the large corporations and banks, plays a major role in shaping the
social and political climate, and dominates the federal government through a
variety of organizations and methods.
"The upper class as a whole does
not do this ruling. Instead, class rule is manifested through the activities of
a wide variety of organizations and institutions. These organizations and
institutions are financed and directed by those members of the
upper class who have the interest and ability to involve themselves in
protecting and enhancing the privileged social position of their class. Leaders
within the upper class join with high-level employees in the organizations
they control to make up what will be called the power elite. This
power elite is the leadership group of the upper class, for not all
members of the upper class are members of the power elite and not all members
of the power elite are members of the upper class. It is members of the power
elite who take part in the processes that maintain the class structure."
G. William Domhoff
Who Rules America Now?
While that appears correct, insofar as it
goes, Domhoff's thesis has its shortcomings. His book
contains factual and analytical obfuscation. Key elements are left out: racial,
ethnic, cultural and religious data are carefully avoided. He simply refuses to
look in certain places. That is clearly unscientific; one might say,
unhistorical. But then, Domhoff never raises the
question, "How did the power elite rise to power?" As a
sociologist, his job is merely defining the social structure and behavior of
this particular social class, leaving it to the historian or the anthropologist
to explain how they came to be. As such, he may comfortably presume that the
elite have always been in control; that they either inherited this power, or
they married into it or they had bought their way in.
Money is the primary determinant of class
in his study, together with membership in certain types of organization, but
not others. Masonic Lodges, B'nai B'rith, the National Academy of Sciences and the
National Security Council are all too conspicuously absent, though Domhoff does observe the Council on Foreign Relations, and
shows particular interest in the Business Council. His presentation begs the
solution that we now empower a third estate — the academic research
community, the intellectual elite — to engineer the necessary social changes
that will produce Justice, meaning that academe will
henceforth arbitrate disputes arising from the inevitable abuse of authority by
this "power elite". Of course, that would also include the question
of standing, the determination of whether a particular complaint is even
acknowledged to exist. [Thus we can be assured future acts of terrorism.] One
must admit that the proposition carries with it a certain
gravity, a sense of inevitability, as though we were getting it anyhow.
As to the question, "How does one
become a member of the power elite?", Domhoff
implies: "Go to a proper boarding school, then to Harvard, earn a Ph.D.,
seek positions of influence and power, and join the right social clubs."
... And exactly what are these "social clubs" to which he refers? Domhoff suggests that their primary membership is drawn
from the Social Register, and that their function is to enforce certain
upper-class values and social attitudes, and to provide an atmosphere where
"new ideas" can be floated like "trial balloons" ...
something like a Bourgeois Lodge, with branch temple-resorts in Aspen,
St. Moritz and Cannes. One might suppose a highly-paid entertainer, a
supermodel or a famous athlete would equally qualify for membership. And of
course, the media is ever-present.
Domhoff indicates that the appreciation of real estate
values through the intensification of land usage has always been a
private concern of the upper class, especially at the local political level.
Perhaps this explains our municipal planners' insatiable appetite for multi-culturalism, their love for immigration and incessant
proselytizing about the "benefits" of a world without borders —
only property rights and the intensification of land usage.
What's amazing in all of this is that Domhoff's thesis is based entirely upon the classic Marxist
ideal of class conflict, to the exclusion of racial, cultural or religious
concerns. And in this respect, the "politically correct" upper class of American society do certainly dance to the piper's
tune. In other words, Domhoff's theory of social
elitism and the Unified Conspiracy Theory are not mutually exclusive
models. We simply propose to look a bit deeper.
Who are the "power elite" and
what is their agenda?
Observe how differently the professor's statement
of purpose reads when one substitutes the words Freemason, Zionist, Marxist,
Jew, Communist, Mobster, Tycoon, Capitalist, Socialist or Technocrat for
the hypothetical and faceless term "power elite" – "those
with the interest and ability to involve themselves ... with high-level
employees in the organizations they control ... [to become] the leadership
group of the upper class."
The leadership group of the upper class ... not all of whom are even members of the upper class."
I had to read those lines many times over,
before their true meaning began to sink in. Of course.
The way to join the "power elite" is to become a leader — a
trend setter — of upper class attitudes, social values and beliefs. The
upper class are influenced through the medium of
cultural, religious and educational institutions.
Observe how the media, academe,
churches and philanthropic institutions today are overwhelmingly socialist, globalist and Marxist (especially in terms of
"developed" and "underdeveloped" nations). There is a clear
agenda at work. Now observe how Domhoff refers to
these institutions as being financed and directed
by the "power elite". At this point, they may as well be named
— in fact, they are. You only need to look, and see who are the donors,
trustees and beneficiaries of our greatest philanthropies and shudder. And yet
so many of you are afraid to look, and count. The veil is lifting.
This "socio-political" agenda
has been accomplished through the manipulation of our culture, by rewriting
history, by applying praise and guilt, making the upper class
"feel good" about themselves when they
behave in the "politically-correct" manner. Such conditioning is
possible when a cabal has achieved significant influence within academe
and the media. You see, the wealthy are really just sheeple
like you and me. They generally think and act in exactly the way they believe
they are supposed to behave. One simply applauds the very mediocrity of the
upper class ... the more mediocre they are, the more accolade they are given.
Lady Spencer (a.k.a. "Princess" Diana) and Ted Turner are splendid
examples of this. Men of genius are as rare among the upper class as they are
among the commons.
Support from within the upper class is
essential to the success of any cultural, political or religious movement;
there has never been a case in history where this is not true. If a cabal for world dominion does exist, we would
expect to find it operating within our cultural, educational and religious
institutions – all of which are being drawn into academe –
and functioning in both capacities: inculcating the upper class with a desired
set of social attitudes, and also purging these institutions of unwanted
contrary influence (men of genius, especially those with Western cultural,
racial or religious awareness). Weed out the latter, construct barriers between
genius and the wealthy, between the wealthy and the soul of their people, and
the upper class will naturally become a Bourgeois.
The existence of the
"political-correctness" movement within academe is evidence
that such a conspiracy does indeed exist. Consider the following events,
resulting from Lee Bass' 1991 endowment of $20 million to Yale University in
order to finance 7 tenured professors ($14 mil), 2 associates ($2 mil), and to
provide logistical support ($4 mil):
"When in 1995, Yale returned $20 million given by Lee Bass to form a Western Civilization studies program, President Richard Levin claimed that logistical difficulties made implementing the project unfeasible and expensive. Recent developments in Yale's curriculum now call this into question.
"Yale's approval of the new Ethnicity, Race, and Migration (ER&M) major on March 6 [1997] codifies the highly politicized nature of Yale's curricular policy. Over the past few years this policy has repeatedly thwarted attempts to bolster Western Civilization programs while encouraging ER&M and Gay Studies majors. Those administrative obstacles supposedly fatal to the Bass proposal have not blocked the other two programs.
Avik S.
Roy: Race Studies
Trump the Canon from Light & Truth (a Yale publication)
The rejected Bass grant represents more
than just the careers of seven professors and two associates – presumably
white native American males and their dependent
families – that might have been; it also represents their would-have-been
protegés, the cumulative impact of their
respective careers. The impact upon our posterity will certainly be greater
than the loss of a football stadium. And it passed with hardly a whimper.
Is it mere coincidence that Yale President
Richard Levin is a Jew? Of course, one must never use that word; so we simply
look the other way. And so, while the upper class in America
are entrained upon trivial self-congratulation, they become increasingly
predictable – increasingly controllable – precisely because of
their mediocrity and conformism. That was essentially the method used by
Mordecai and his niece Esther to gain control over King Ahasuerus
in the Book of Esther.
This is the main theme of Dostoyevsky's
novel, The Possessed, about how a few manipulative individuals can
wreak havoc within a Gentile social structure.
It is also, for that matter, the
methodology of the Protocols. Especially if one can keep the wealthy
very busy and self-absorbed, and nearly harassed with socialist nicety, gossip
and telescopic philanthropy, they will be incapable of mounting a serious
resistance to any outside agenda — even the most diabolical form of
national subversion — simply because they won't be able to see it.
In a more modern perspective, if a
cabal can gain control over the institutions of national culture, and thereby
manipulate the attitudes and beliefs of the upper class, subversion of the
nation will follow. So goes the theory. Now for the test: has anything like
this actually occurred in the United States? Who are the "power
elite", and what is their relationship with the upper class?
The key identifiers are clear: who are in control of the media, culture
(entertainment) and academe?
·
Who created the media?
·
Who are the biggest advertisers?
·
Who control the foundations?
·
Who are the writers, professors, composers and
thinkers?
·
Who are the directors, programmers and editors?
·
Who are producing the "educational" propaganda
that is being spoon-fed our youngsters?
These questions are easy enough to answer
– often as simple as reading the credits at the end of a movie or TV
program – and yet how few sheeple even dare to
look?
Are we afraid to see that the
financiers, organizers and policy-makers are primarily Jews and their minions, and that all of these are globalist,
internationalist, multicultural, pro-Zionist and Technocrats? That they are all
seeking the classic Marxist one-world government? Our social, cultural and
educational institutions are all interconnected, they share a common goal, and
they all exclude dissent. Professor Domhoff
refers to these, collectively, as the "opinion shaping and policy
making network".
One can also observe that this same cadre
of internationalists have held directorships, political appointments and key
cabinet positions in Federal administrations from the time of Theodore
Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson to the present; many are also members of the
Council on Foreign Relations, but of more immediate concern are the National
Security Council, the Secretaries of Treasury and Defense, the International
Space Agency and the National Academy of Sciences (all controlled by Jews);
that they are financed by — and interconnected with — the central
banking firms, stock exchanges, multinationals and universities; that they
represent the interests of the importers, the distributors, merchandisers and
finance agents; that they are also among the largest developers and
institutional property-owners ... and so many of them – in America
– are Jews. The veil is lifting.
As one proceeds downward in his study of
the power structure as it exists today, from the apex to the base of the
pyramid, to examine state and local governments, chambers of commerce, law
firms, party bosses, union leaders, political activists and social scientists,
teachers, media owners, advertisers, civil defense and communications, doctors
and psychologists, committee-persons, planning boards, arts and cultural
organizers ... our reader should get the point. The same pattern emerges ...
and once again, an almost-complete absence of dissent!
It is that silence of dissent that is so
convincing. It is so very near complete, there is but the faintest wail. You
can hear it in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, which postulates a
time when no one will have the opportunity to be heroic, when great art will be
sacrificed on the altar of universal happiness. Children will be bred by the
state and conditioned to feel happy in their pre-assigned social roles. That
was in 1932. Much of what he predicted has already occurred. You can hear it in
Dostoyevsky, The Possessed,
where "long-eared" Shigalov (the genius!)
calculates how a tenth of humanity will someday enjoy complete freedom over the
other nine-tenths, who are happy to be bred-down to the level of beasts.
"We shall strangle every
genius in infancy!" ... "It will be the
Garden of Eden!" That
was written in 1872, more than twenty years before the infamous Protocols of
the Learned Elders of Zion. Interestingly, Shatov,
the character who dared speak the truth about nationalist-religion, was
ritually murdered to "cement" the subversive cell. Dostoyevsky knew.
We can see that the work of Professor Domhoff and his colleagues, who are sociologists, psychologists
and primarily Israelites, is far from irrelevant. Quite the contrary, their
research is most enlightening – one might even say critical to our
understanding the situation in which we find ourselves – so long as we
are aware that they have an interest in deflecting our attention away from the
significance of the fact that they are Jews.
The veil is lifting, and the closer we
approach the nexus of power, the more frequently we encounter Jews and their
lackeys: feminists, minority activists and spineless liberal professors –
the classic Marxist coalition. We must bear in mind that nearly a
third of all Freemasons are also Jews; and that from the time of the
Blackstone Memorial, Freemasonry has been actively pro-Zionist; neither shall
we forget B'nai B'rith.
One must also observe how, at the highest
institutional levels, the power of Freemasonry has been largely overthrown from
its preeminence of two hundred years past. The fall of Freemasonry has been matched
by a corresponding rise in the power and prestige of the Jews, and of their
centrality within cultural, scientific and educational institutions. It is
as though the power structure that had been built by Freemasonry had become crystalized, institutionalized, and the Jews have quietly
slid into the driver's seat, inviting in all of their friends.
Look around, and bear in mind that the
objective of the cabal is not just to achieve dominion, but to preserve that
Dominion by breeding us down.
·
Why is our
homeland overrun by hordes of third-world opportunists? Who threw open our borders and invited these peoples in? Why did
President Clinton proclaim to the United States, and to the world, that we must
prepare for the next century "when whites will be the minority in
America"?
·
Who wants
this? America has been turned into New Babylon — or B-A-B-A-L-O-N,
the multicultural "melting-pot" – making us into the ideal
environment for Galuth, the Diaspora Jews. The
Jew prospers in America today as nowhere else in the world. Is this purely by
chance?
·
What is this
"America" of which our President speaks? Will it include Puerto Rico,
Mexico, Cuba, Jamaica, Haiti and the Dominican Republic? Canada, the
Philippines and Taiwan?
·
Why have our
cities been turned into barrios that more resemble ethnic
occupation-zones?
·
Who is behind
all of this?
·
How did the
power of bestowing citizenship come to reside within the Department of Justice,
the agency that is farthest removed from the people, and which is now literally
running out of control?
·
Why does the
Fourteenth Amendment still contain wording that disfranchises anyone opposed to
federalism (and internationalism)?
·
Why has
there never been a national referendum in the United States on immigration
policy?
·
Why is our
media so biased against our own native and racial interest?
·
Who are
teaching our children to say: "We are a nation of immigrants and they
have a right to be here"?
·
Who control
PBS, PRI (Public Radio International), the Learning Channel and educational TV?
·
Who started
calling the North American Indians "Native Americans", as though the
rest of us are not native Americans ourselves?
·
Why are our
"American" universities overflowing with aliens and foreigners, even as
we are shackled with taxes to subsidize them?
·
Why is there
no public recognition that we are being dispossessed from our homeland?
·
Why have our
own women and children been turned against us?
·
Why must we
suffer the fate of Rome, of Babylon and Egypt?
·
Who are the
people that are financing and directing this network of predatory institutions?
If one is going to go to such lengths to pull the strings of an innocent people
and strip them of their homeland, there must be some kind of agenda behind it.
One doesn't do such things for sport.
|
Not like
the brazen giant of Greek fame, Emma Lazarus |
In so many words, Emma is showing us the
answer: her image of the "Mother of Exiles" standing at our gates,
inviting the refuse of the world to enter in. Who is this "Mother of
Exiles"? Who put that damned statue outside our harbor and called it the
"golden door"? A harbor is a place of refuge, but not a permanent
abode. The "golden door" is something altogether different. Is
there an intentional twist of poetic irony in all of this, something like the
fabled Trojan Horse, but infinitely more malevolent?
Maybe we are the bigger fools, to have let someone else give away our
homeland. To whom and for what?
We do know that Emma Lazarus was a Jewess
and a committed Zionist, her father a wealthy New York sugar refiner (which
industry still employs the lowest-paid workers in the world). Who else could
this "New Colossus" – this "Mother of Exiles" –
be than the Golah,
the "Deserted Wife" of Isaiah, beckoning her children to follow, and
to "set firm their stakes". She is also the Jew standing at our
gates, inviting the peoples of the world to enter in. To them she is B-A-B-A-L-O-N,
the "melting pot", Queen of the City of the Pyramids. Her number is an
hundred and fifty-six. Six times twenty-six. The
number of Zion is also an hundred and fifty-six. Is this all coincidence?
Yet surely, the Jews are the
"Mother of all Exiles". Perhaps we have too quickly assumed that Emma
Lazarus was merely a bad poetess. We may have been fooled. Read her poem again,
in light of its title, The New Colossus. This is not to be an empire
built by valiant arms, as had the ancient Greeks and Romans. This New
Colossus is an empire built by way of deception, trickery and betrayal, by
means of stealth and irredentism. These are the ways of the god of Jacob. The
statue of "Liberty Enlightening the World" was the gift of French Jacobites, given in 1886, the fourth year of the Jewish
exodus to the United States. She cradles a plaque in her arm, like Moses the
Ten Commandments, inscribed with the numeral "1776" as though to
commemorate the American Revolution. That plaque represents the equality
polemic of the Declaration of Independence...
"That
all men are created equal"
... and it should be borne in mind that,
at the time those words were written, the Revolutionary War was already in
full-swing, and the purpose of the Declaration of Independence was to
muster the support of the commons behind the already-selected leaders. It was
not necessary that those leaders actually believe their own propaganda.
Be that as it may, in the final analysis,
the "Equality Polemic" tends to deny the existence of both
"national rights" (as in a homeland) and individual rights, in order
to assert its own ideal of "Human Rights", which are to be shared
"equally" by all world-citizens.
It was this equality polemic that Charles
Sumner and the Illuminati wished to elevate to equal standing with the
Constitution, and together with international treaties, as the Law of the Land.
The plaque represents Human Rights, the banner of the Society for Ethical
Culture, organized as the Humanist Church of Man (Woman).
The symbol of the imprisoned lightning
represents the feminist usurpation of the male creative spirit, one of the
occult secrets of Mystery Babylon. The Statue of Liberty was erected in the
year 1886, the centennial of 1786, the year before the
"Constitutional" convention was foisted upon our forefathers. It was
the year when the Federalist conspiracy was set in motion, when the State of
Virginia refused to honor the five percentum
under the Articles of Confederation because the international bankers had
been caught tampering with the books. The 1786-1886 centennial represents
the betrayal of the American Revolution.
Why does Emma use the words, "our
sea-washed, sunset gates" in line three? Who is "we"?
New York is on our (white native American) eastern
coast. Why the sunset? Emma's "we" is clearly not us native
Americans. Are these "sunset gates" to be opened for something to be
brought in, or for something else to emerge? Perhaps both? The western is the sunset coast, and sunset
beckons the night.
For, behold, darkness shall cover the earth,
And gross darkness the peoples;
But upon thee the Lord will arise,
And His glory shall be seen upon thee.
And nations shall walk at thy light,
And kings at the brightness of thy rising.
Lift up thine eyes round about, and see:
They all are gathered together, and come to thee;
Thy sons come from far,
And thy daughters are borne on the side.
Then thou shalt see and be radiant,
And thy heart shall throb and be enlarged;
Because the abundance of the sea shall be turned unto thee,
The wealth of the nations shall come unto thee.
Isaiah 60:2-5
According to the Masoretic Text
What a perfect companion to Emma Lazarus'
poem. Or vice versa; a perfect match. What spectacular imagery, the Mother
of Exiles lighting the way for her children in the darkness of night. The image of Columbia leading the proletarian masses, and
the Illuminati who named the Seat of their government the "District of
Columbia". Oh my, have we been fooled?
Of all the possibilities that had existed
for our people – our forefathers – two hundred and fifty years ago,
why has it come down to this? Is it so impossible to imagine that we might have
closed our borders at any time? That we could have preserved our heritage and developed
a culture and a homeland of our own? The ancient Romans, whose origins were
remarkably similar to ours, had managed to do so for many centuries, up until
the time they became an empire. During the earlier period of the Republic, they
guarded their citizenship so jealously that they fought against their own
allies in the Marsian Wars to make that point. Yet we
treat our own "citizenship" as if it were a cheap entitlement to be
handed out in a world lottery.
Whose idea was it that the United States be made into an empire – Columbia
(another name for America) – with the full knowledge that this would mean
the destruction of our freedom, that we suffer the fate of ancient Rome? That
we be stripped of our heritage and boiled down in the "melting pot"
of race-mixing, as though we were common ingredients for a mad witch's brew? And to what purpose? To breed the new
world-proletariat?
The great achievements of Western
Civilization were made possible by what the ancient Romans called dignitas. It means the pride of a people in their
ancestry, their heritage and their culture. It is for this reason that the
aristocracy shared, and sometimes enforced, a "dominant" culture on
their people. To be a Roman was to have dignitas.
It meant holding to a higher standard than barbarians and savages. It meant
discipline and sacrifice, and these virtues were embodied in every aspect of
their culture. The ancient Roman aristocracy understood that they maintained
the strength and character of their people, their dignitas,
through upholding their inherited culture.
In America, the upper class
have pursued an entirely different agenda than past Western
Civilization. Our elite have renounced their responsibility to their own race,
and sold out for the bogus utopia of socialism and multiculturalism as a cover
for Bourgeois self-gratification. They have literally
turned upon their own people, and leant themselves to the construction of this
vast machinery of socialization that now oppresses us. It is
precisely this change in attitude among the upper class that beckons the sunset
of civilization, for which Emma had so yearned.
In America, the condition appears to have
been prematurely induced. Our concept of "heritage" was
systematically undermined, and replaced by its antithesis – the
"melting pot". And so the thought of conspiracy looms over us. The
issue to be resolved, then, is this: Is there a central, unifying conspiracy
of such significance that it has been able to alter the course of history?
This writer maintains that there is.
At this point in the argument, we will
present the barest outline of He-Khabbalot Yahudim, saving the esoteric discussion for later.
Beginning as we are, in media res, what
matters is that the theory we are presenting can be reconciled with world power
as it is known to exist today, and with the historical chain of events that has
led to our present condition. We shall emphasize the centrality of the Hebrew
Prophecies, so often disregarded because of our refusal to examine our
own religious beliefs and indoctrination.
The picture, thus far unfolded, is that
Freemasonry had successfully contained the forces behind the American
Revolution and, by 1789, the lodges had achieved their
objective in the creation of the Constitution of the United States of America.
One could almost add an "Inc." onto the end of that, because this
Constitution had been imposed for the singular purpose of restoring the
briefly-sovereign states [actually, nations] to their original condition
as subsidiary incorporations under a higher authority.
In the course of the American Revolution,
the Lodge had managed to re-establish its control over the entire political
process, from the smallest town to the highest court, and over all the major
institutions of religion, industry, socialization and science. They had, in
fact, reinstated that very same British System from which the colonists had
originally revolted.
However, in the process of securing this
domain, the Masons had incurred substantial debt, in the name of "the
United States in Congress Assembled"; and this money was owed primarily to
a network of Sephardic banking institutions operating out of the Netherlands,
and also to the upstart Ashkenazi capitalists of the Rhineland, Austria and
France. The new Constitution had been created largely to satisfy these
investment demands, securing the loans with land mapped out within the Republic
and its Territories.
In fact, several significant tracts of
real estate had been sold by the Republic, many to European investors, in order
to make payment on these loans. But on the surface, everything was under
control, and the Republic had excellent credit, as much for its tobacco, cotton
and indigo monopolies, as for its vast land reserve. It had a large,
well-equipped merchant fleet, and one of the most
technologically-advanced money systems in the world.
Meanwhile, another nation was arising out
of Europe, seeking a literal fulfillment of the Hebrew Prophecies
themselves. This Other Nation had, for nearly two millennia, been outcast,
persecuted, hated and despised by mankind; for according to legend, they had
been driven out of their homeland by their own god for their iniquities. Thus
accursed, secrecy and intrigue have become a way of life for these people, that even their god YHVH remains shrouded in
mystery and myth. It is a god who can never be named, a god of no name; and it
is also a god of many names. More than anything else, their god is a religious
deification of their race, and that is what has held these people together for
so many centuries, and upheld their belief in the fulfillment of their peculiar
racial destiny.
The Jews have always known themselves to
be the "Chosen People". It was out of sheer necessity that they
acquired their aptitude for assimilation along with a unique self-governing
capability; and once developed, this power was not limited in its application.
It also enabled them to function as a parasite within their several host
countries, to "suck the milk of nations", to and conquer nations from
within.
The Book of Esther is a blueprint
for this kind of political subversion, as also the career of Joseph who, having
first collected all the grain surplus in Egypt for
seven years, took advantage of a famine to create a money-crisis:
"And Joseph gathered up all the
money that was found in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, for the
corn which they bought: and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh's house.
"And when money failed in the land
of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came unto Joseph, and
said, Give us bread: for why should we die in your presence? for
the money faileth.
"And Joseph said, Give your
cattle; and I will give you [grain] for your cattle, if money fail.
"And they brought their cattle
unto Joseph: and Joseph gave them bread in exchange for horses, and for the
flocks, and for the cattle of the herds, and for the asses: and he fed them
with bread for all their cattle for that year.
"When that year was ended, they
came unto him that second year, and said unto him, We
will not hide it from my lord, how that our money is spent; my lord also hath
our herds of cattle; there is not ought left in the sight of my lord, but our
bodies, and our lands:
"Wherefore we shall die before thine eyes, both we and our land? Buy us and our land for
bread, and we and our land will be servants unto Pharaoh: and give us seed,
that we may live, and not die, that the land be not desolate.
"And Joseph bought all the land of
Egypt for Pharaoh; for the Egyptians sold every man his field, because the
famine prevailed over them; so the land became Pharaoh's.
"And as for the people, he
removed them to the cities from one end of the borders of Egypt even to the
other end thereof.
Genesis 47,
14-21
King James Version
"And he removed the people (the
Native Egyptians) to the cities" ... exactly what is being done
to every country today, while cheap immigrant labor is imported in. The United
States is being destroyed in exactly the same way as Ancient Egypt was –
by amalgamation!
How remarkably like the Federal Reserve.
Even as I write this, the process is being replicated against the Asian nations
through the IMF bailout of their sudden monetary crisis, and also against the
Europeans, whose destiny is shackled to the ECU. Britain and America (North,
Central and South) are already in the hands of the Rothschilds, Rockefellers
and Warburgs, and so only Sweden and Denmark remain aloof, for the present. And Switzerland is paying
reparations, not to deny that they, too, have their great Jewish banking
houses.
The Jews from early on had become the
masters of mammon, the supreme power over men, and they learned the
secret of its creation, which is the power to instill faith in money. This
knowledge, combined with their deeply esoteric nature and peculiar instinct for
racial survival, turned them into a vampire nation.
Just as Joseph had delivered Egypt unto
Pharaoh, America was handed over to the Jews. As Mordecai, in the Book of
Esther, had plotted the overthrow of Aman the antisemite and subverted the kingdom of Xerxes, the
Illuminati, agents of He-Khabbalot Yahudim, managed to subvert the Freemasons and the
institutions that they had so carefully constructed. Just as the Cabal in
ancient Babylon twice betrayed that city, opening its gates first to Cyrus the
Mede and later to Darius the Persian, so He-Khabbalot
have thrown open our gates to admit, first the Jews, and then the tide of
third-world migration.
"But the
Illuminati are not all Jews,"
you say. And that is correct. We were not betrayed by the Jews;
we have been betrayed to the Jews. Moses was only Hebrew by birth,
allegedly; but culturally, he was Egyptian. He had been raised up in the Egyptian
priesthood, not the ways of Abraham.
Nobody is quite sure where the Levites
came from.
And who was this other character –
Aaron – Moses' companion and high-priest? Tradition says that Aaron was
Moses' brother, therefore a Levite. But what Hebrew, other than Moses, could
possibly have been initiated into the Egyptian priesthood? The answer is none,
because the Hebrew nation did not yet exist. It was Moses who initiated Aaron
into the Mysteries, and together they created the Hebrew nation. The
"Covenant" is their handiwork. Their successors are He-Khabbalot Yahudim.
The Jews are merely instruments in
the hands of He-Khabbalot; the Jews are the handiwork
and also the carriers of the cabal. Consider what the scriptures have to say about this:
They shall inherit the land for ever;
The branch of My planting, the work of My hands,
Wherein I glory.
The smallest shall become a thousand,
And the least a mighty nation;
I the Lord will hasten it in its time.
Isaiah 60:21-22
According to the Masoretic Text
Interestingly, the Masonic Lodge teaches
much the same thing: that the secret knowledge of Hiram Abiff
was far older than even the Hebrews; that it reaches back before the time of
Egypt of the pharaohs to Sumeria, in the most distant
past, and the Chaldean Magi.
Joseph was no mere shepherd boy; he could
never have become Pharaoh's counselor had he not been an initiate of the
Mysteries. Various Jewish researchers have even suggested that the Levites
(which include Moses by birth) were not necessarily of the seed of Abraham,
that they had merely taken the name Levi during the Exodus.
It is argued that the "Hebrews" of the Exodus were really a polyglot mix of
peoples, remnants of the Hyksos and various
hangers-on. It is suggested that the actual seed of Abraham had long since
amalgamated — and what of his daughters, or had he none? With whom did
his grandsons-and-daughters intermarry? Who was there to record and safeguard
the genealogy? Only a priesthood could manage such matters, and even then for
only a few — the initiates, of course.
Clearly, by the time of the Exodus only
the myth — and perhaps a secret
priesthood — remained, to be used by Moses and Aaron in
creating this New Race, the "Children of Israel".
The name Moses is itself Egyptian,
not Hebrew, and it means simply, "the son of ...".
Thuthmosis is Thoth-moses,
"Son of Thoth". Rameses
is Ra-moses, "Son of Ra". The investiture
of Joseph as Vizier in Egypt is dated somewhere between 1884 and 1570 B.C.E.,
either just before or at the very beginning of the rule of the Hyksos, or "Shepherd-Kings", who had migrated
into the northeastern Delta region during a famine, generally dated around the
mid-17th century B.C.E., a period when Egypt was weak and divided.
The Hyksos were
Semites, semi-nomadic Canaanite tribes and, like Abraham, descended from the
earlier Semitic peoples of Ur [or Aur, meaning
"Light"] and Chaldea, which name literally
means "Light of the Magi". The Egyptian word for Hebrew, Habiru or Hapiru,
refers to these people as a class. It meant "caravan-men", or
"dusty men", because the Habiru clans would
often migrate on long trading journeys, taking their women, children and flocks
along with them. The Hapiru were also skilled metalsmiths, and they understood the making of money, that
tool by which Joseph managed to enslave the Egyptians and deliver them unto
Pharaoh (the beginning of the Hyksos reign?).
The Hyksos ruled
Egypt from their capital at Avaris for about a
hundred years, until the Egyptians rebelled under the pharaohs Thutmosis (1560-1550) and Amosis
(1552-1527) and enslaved those whom they captured. Under terms of an armistice,
approximately 250,000 unconquered Hyksos left Egypt with
their possessions and settled in the area between Jerusalem and Damascus.
The Hebrew Exodus is Biblically dated
between 1501 and 1447, or shortly after the Hyksos
expulsion, though some chronologists have placed the date as late as 1270. When
Moses was on Sinai receiving the Commandments, we are told that the people said
unto Aaron, "Make us gods which will go before us" and reverted to
paganism (Ex. 32:1), thus demonstrating the lack of any common religion or
identity.
Moses provided essentially that, creating
a new religion that was an amalgamation of Chaldean,
Sumerian, Egyptian and Midianite mysteries and
practices. He presented his people with a "Covenant" that they
should dwell in their "Promised Land" according to the Law of Moses,
and not intermingle with foreigners. To what purpose?
One thing is certain. The Egyptians had, by this time, amalgamated with other
races and grown weak.
Everything in the Mosaic Law was aimed at
preserving the purity of the newly-created Hebrew race. Were Moses and Aaron
dabbling in the science of human husbandry?
Some five hundred years
later, upon the death of Solomon (around 985 B.C.E.), the Hebrews began to
falter. Solomon had greatly abused the people with forced labor, heavy taxation
and the oppressive levy of virgins to supply his harem, while his own tribe of
Judah had been privileged as tax-collectors, as the tribe of Levi were
privileged to be the priests. The other ten tribes seceded from Jerusalem and
formed their own kingdom to the north, Israel, with its capital at Samaria.
About two hundred years later, around 722
B.C.E., the northern kingdom of Israel was captured by Shalmaneser,
king of Assyria. He scattered the ten tribes of Israel to the farthest reaches
of his empire so that, by separating these people from their land and heritage,
and from one another, he also destroyed their culture, religion and ethnicity,
causing them to amalgamate with his other subject peoples. He clearly
understood that amalgamation is the only way to destroy a race.
Meanwhile, in Judea to the south, the
prophets Micah and Isaiah were eyewitness to the fate of Israel. They
understood how Judea would be next; that the Mosaic law
would sooner or later fail them. Shalmanesser was
neither the first conqueror, nor would he be the last to practice genocide by
amalgamation. Yet these prophets were also Magi, initiates of the Mysteries,
and so they undertook nothing less than the complete reconstruction of the
Mosaic religion.
They created the Hebrew
Prophecies, the Myth of Golah and Aliyah, the Diaspora and Return to Eretz Yisreal, the
Land of Greater Israel. They
crafted this religion so that it could endure the conditions of exile,
preserving the race. Amalgamation is countered by assimilation. This Second
Chosen People (oops!) that was born out of the tribes of Judah and Levi became
known as the Jews:
Sing, O barren, thou that didst not bear,
Break forth into singing, and cry aloud, thou that didst not travail;
For more are the children of the desolate
Than the children of the married wife, saith the Lord.Enlarge the place of thy tent,
And let them stretch forth the curtains of thy habitations, spare not;
Lengthen thy cords, and strengthen thy stakes.
For thou shalt spread abroad on the right hand and on the left;
And thy seed shall possess the nations,
And make the desolate cities to be inhabited.Fear not, for thou shalt not be ashamed.
Neither be thou confounded, for thou shalt not be put to shame;
For thou shalt forget the shame of thy youth,
And the reproach of thy widowhood shalt thou remember no more.
Isaiah 54:1-4
According to the Masoretic Text
Incidentally, the word
"desolate" does not mean "empty of bodies" in the physical
sense, but rather spiritual absence of He-Shekhinah,
the indwelling manifestation of God. He-Goyim (meaning ourselves) are
not really "people", in the sense of having souls (the Shekhinah); we are something halfway between animal
and human.
Obviously, there is nothing wrong with
breeding us like farm animals. It
is not a pretty picture, from our Goy perspective. Also, please observe
how – and this shall be pointed out again later – these verses are
constructed as poetic couplets, a pattern of strophe and antistrophe,
sermon and refrain, prayer and response, and they are meant to be reenacted as
such. They are musical and ceremonial in nature. They are part of a formally
codified practice of ceremonial magick. They
are extremely powerful, and they are a curse.
One should need look no further to
understand what we mean now by He-Khabbalot Yahudim – the Jewish Curse, the Jewish Welcome,
and the Jewish Cabal. Understand the power of such magick,
ceremonially performed over and over again, for a period of two thousand and
seven hundred years. The people need not know what they do, or why, because
"in the saying the act is accomplished."
The fall of Jerusalem and the conquest of
Judea by Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, is dated
between 597 and 586 B.C.E., approximately one hundred and fifty years after the
fall of Israel. During that interim, the new religion created by Isaiah and
Micah had time to take hold. Now begins the Diaspora, the Exile, and with it
the promise of Redemption and Revenge:
"And Aliens shall build up thy walls,
And their kings shall minister unto thee;"For in My wrath I smote thee,
But in My favor have I had compassion on thee."Thy gates also shall be open continually,
Day and night, they shall not be shut;
That men may bring unto thee the wealth of the nations,
And their kings in procession."For that nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish;
Yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted."
Isaiah 60:8-12
According to the Masoretic Text
Once again we can see, preserved in the Masoretic Text, the poetic couplets that mark these
"prophecies" of Isaiah, and begin to comprehend the effect of their
repetition – a grimoire of ceremonial
cursing – as it has been practiced over the millennia. One cannot help
but reflect on the fate of the Third Reich, and perceive how the Hebrew
Prophecies are indeed finding fulfillment in our own time.
Many Christians have observed how nations
have been raised up and cast down according to the way they have treated the
Jews, and concluded this as proof that the Jews are the "Chosen People of
God".
Yet few of these Christians have investigated
the matter further, from an historical and non-Biblical perspective (as do many
Jews themselves), to understand how each nation that was raised, had been
raised up by the power of Jewish banking and finance (from the time of the Hyksos), and how each was then subverted before it was cast
down ... to see how every nation that has ever been visited by the Jews, has
eventually been betrayed by the Jews.
Is this the work of "God", or is
it a result of He-Khabbalot Yahudim,
the Jewish Curse?
Today we can see our own
"kings", be they presidents or clerics – capitalists,
Freemasons or academicians – who have delivered us up to He-Khabbalot Yahudim. Think of
the cabal as being like a disease that has been carried by the Jews. Like it or
not, we have become infected by it and, like it or not, we are now compelled to
serve Zion.
It has long been written in the holiest
scripture, in the depth of the Jewish collective soul, that it is their destiny
and birthright to rule the World:
The word that Isaiah the
son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem.
And it shall come to pass in the end of days,
That the mountain of the Lord's house shall be established as the top of the
mountains,
And it shall be exalted above the hills;
And all nations shall flow into it.
And many peoples shall go and say:
"Come ye, and let us go up to the
mountain of the Lord,
To the house of the God of Jacob;
And He will teach us of His ways,
And we will walk in His paths."
For out of Zion shall go forth the law,
And the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.
And He shall judge between the nations,
And shall decide for many peoples;
Isaiah 2:1-4 - According to the Masoretic Text
These same verses are today inscribed
on the "Isaiah Wall", outside of the United Nations Building in New
York City. That, in itself, is
sufficient cause to weigh their historical significance.
One need only ponder the influence of the
Hebrew-Jewish-Christian Bible upon our culture and beliefs, to gain some idea
of its awesome power. For the past fifty years, even as I write this, the veil
has been lifting. Perhaps, before long, the whole world will know, and these
things whereof I write shall be made clear. And if, knowing the Zionists to be
our masters, we should then continue to submit (as I think we must), shall we
not then acknowledge ourselves to be their slaves?
And strangers shall stand and feed your flocks,
And aliens shall be your plowmen and your vinedressers.
But ye shall be named the priests of the Lord,
Men shall call you the ministers of our God;
Ye shall eat the wealth of the nations,
And in their splendor shall ye revel.
Isaiah 61:5-6
According to the Masoretic Text.
And the sons of them that afflicted thee
Shall come bending unto thee,And all they that despised thee shall bow down
At the soles of thy feet;And they shall call thee The City of the Lord,
The Zion of the Holy One of Israel.
Isaiah 60:14
According to the Masoretic Text
Do you get it? The "City of the
Lord" is the same as the Nation of Israel, which includes all Jews, Diaspora
and Israeli. It is the same vision that John the Evangelist evokes in the Book
of Revelations.
So where in hell did he get the
idea that this is supposed to be Jesus' "Second Coming"? Was the author of the "Christian"
Apocalypse perhaps, like the Knights Templar of a later age, and the Freemasons
four centuries after that, trying to steal the Jewish mystique?
It really is pitiful. Jesus had given his life to destroy the
self-fulfilling prophecies of Zionist millennialism, and yet
within a century of his death, we find the "Christian" Church
endeavoring to bring about the same, heedless of Jesus' repeated admonishment, "My
kingdom is not of this world!"
And do take a moment to appreciate the
poetic construction of the Masoretic Text, how each
part is complete in itself (i.e., you can skip every-other line).
The Prophecies shall be examined in
greater detail in a later chapter, Zionism and the New World Order; for
now it is sufficient to admit that all nations know and fear the Hebrew
Prophecies, whether we believe in them or not. Given the religious
conviction carried forth from these visions, it is not surprising to find that,
even as the children of Jacob and Judah have wandered from land to land, their
destiny has become interwoven with that of every other nation, and their
religion has influenced every other, and their superstitions have become the
beliefs of many peoples. Yet, throughout the centuries of Diaspora, the Chosen
Race has always managed to assimilate without itself being amalgamated, and to
preserve intact the power of its supernatural destiny.
As one grasps the awesome significance of
the Hebrew Prophecies, and the centrality of He-Khabbalot
Yahudim, one begins to understand how all the
other "conspiracy theories" that have gained such popularity – the Council of 300, the Club of Rome,
Scarlet and the Beast, the Skull & Bones, the Illuminati, Majestic-12, the
Jason Society, the Bilderbergs, MK-Ultra, the Lotus Club, the O.T.O, the Grand
Orient and the Golden Dawn to name a few – are merely tentacles of He-Khabbalot, like little eddies spun off from a giant
whirlpool; and yet, even among these "secret societies" and
"social clubs", one also finds a preponderance of Jews. The veil is
lifting.
At the beginning of the
17th century, the British Empire was rising toward the
pinnacle of global power, assisted by its allies, the Jewish Nation. It was
Oliver Cromwell who first agreed to let the Jews back into England, in return
for their financing the English civil wars. Under William, Duke of Orange, the
trickle of Jewish immigration to England became a torrent, again the result of
a financial agreement. The power of the British Crown was already deeply
intermingled with that of Freemasonry, whose design was to make America into a
Masonic New Sion: the Anglican counterfeit, if you
will, of the New Jerusalem in the ancient Hebrew Prophecies and also in
the Christian Book of Revelation.
The Jewish Nation were meanwhile being
guided and manipulated by their patriarchs, the "Secret Chiefs" or He-Khabbalot Yahudim, the
arch-parasite, whose vision it was that America become the staging-ground for a
Jewish rise to world dominion – the foundation for the "mountain of
the Lord's house" described by the prophets Micah and Isaiah.
Thus America became the object of a
struggle between these contending and yet allied forces. From the perspective
of He-Khabbalot Yahudim,
it was not enough simply to infiltrate and manipulate the lodges of
Freemasonry, for such would be comparable to riding bareback on a tiger who, at any time, might break free.
It was necessary for them to construct a dialectic, an antithesis, a contra-Freemasonic force that
would act as a check and perpetual balance. This was the purpose for which the
Illuminati were created, to act within both Freemasonry and the rising
socialist movements, later Marxism, as agents-provocateur in the service of the
"Secret Chiefs", who themselves would be manipulating the two parties
into a paralysis of equilibrium.
As we have already observed, in Europe
the Illuminati had raised up Napoleon to emancipate the Jews; and in America,
Abraham Lincoln was raised up to prepare the United States to receive the Jews.
It was to this end that the agitation in
America was pushed to the extreme of the Civil War – to shatter the
existing order so that the socialists could rise to equal power within the
Republic. It was to this end that the Illuminati became active in the
leadership of the abolitionists, the feminists, the utopians, the Unitarians
and their allied socialist movements, organizing a coalition that still
survives today.
It was this dialectic – a conflict
between the two polarities of Masonic (pantheistic) capitalism and Illuminist
(atheistic) socialism – that shaped America as we know it, with the financiers
– He-Khabbalot –
characteristically playing both ends against the middle. But it must be
remembered that the "mountain of the Lord's house" is described as an
institution of education and law, neither a religion nor a national
government, but a complete social governing system; that, as this new
ordering of the ages progressed, nation-states would be superseded by global
institutions, and that to crystallize these emergent institutions into the
infrastructure of Zion, the Illuminati themselves – the agitators, the
agents of change – would be transformed from iconoclasts into icons.
[Iconoclast: destroyer of long-held values]
The Illuminati, who had by the late-18th
century gone underground to form esoteric reading societies, emerged from this
gestation as professors and ministers of the Enlightenment, politicians,
academicians and social leaders. It is therefore not surprising to find that
most of the Illuminati agents were indeed Gentiles, and not Jews.
Against such a backdrop, neither is it surprising to find that the most honored
of our Founding Fathers were also being played as pawns:
"John Quincy Adams, in 1800 opposed Thomas Jefferson for the presidency and wrote three letters to Colonel William L. Stone exposing how Jefferson was using Masonic lodges for subversive (Illuminati) purposes. The information contained in these letters is credited with winning Adams the election. The letters were held in the Rittenburg Square Library, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania."
It has already been
described how Adam Weishaupt had established, as his first objective, the
infiltration and subversion of the Lodges of Freemasonry. This had been largely
achieved in Europe by the time of the 1782 Wilhelmsbad
Convention.
In England and America, however, the Lodge
had become split between the Whig and Tory factions. As we recall, the Lodge of
St John's, warranted by the Grand Lodge of England was nominally loyal to the
House of Hanover, which held the English Crown, and represented the American
Tories during the Revolutionary War.
It was the Lodge of St Andrew's, warranted
under the Grand Lodge of Scotland, still pledging loyalty to the deposed
Stuarts, whose membership contained most of the American Revolutionary leaders.
Thus the connection between the American Revolutionary leaders and the French,
who bailed them out, runs through the French Jacobean Lodges, who were later
behind the French Revolution of 1798.
But the Jacobeans were not French; they
were Scots – Stuarts in exile – and the term "Jacobean"
refers to King James I of England (James VI of Scotland) and the Stuart
Dynasty. The name James is simply the Latin form of Jacob. In
light of this, the following piece of information is most extraordinary:
"In 1801, the Tory faction of U.S. Freemasonry – the grouping of Freemasons who had sided with England during the American Revolution – opened up shop as the Grand Council of the Princes of Jerusalem of the Mother Supreme Council of the Knights Commander of the House of the Temple of Solomon of the Thirty-third Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Order of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in the United States. This U.S.-based British Freemasonic Lodge was chartered in Charleston, S.C. The members of this British-led secret society would direct the Confederate secessionist insurrection. Other Scottish Rite members would be among the founders of the B'nai B'rith ...
"Among the founding members of the Charleston Scottish Rite Lodge were many prominent Jews, including Isaac DaCosta, Moses Cohen, Israel De Lieben, Dr. Isaac Held, Moses Levi, and Moses Peixotto. Many of these men were Sephardic Jews from North Africa or from Spain who had originally settled in the Caribbean and engaged in the early slave trade."
EIR (Executive Intelligence Review)
The Ugly Truth About the ADL
Some of these names are
by now familiar. What we see here is evidence of how, some twenty-five years
after the American Revolution, and thirteen years after creation of the
Constitution, the two major factions of European-American Freemasonry had
become reconciled under Jewish leadership. The American Lodge of St.
Andrew, which claims the Templar heritage, is being Illuminated
by Sephardic Jews, as had their Stuart-Jacobean brethren in France been
illuminated by the Ashkenazim.
The other Freemasonic lineage is the
Hanoverian Lodge of St. John (the Pretender), whose
roots go back to the British, French, Dutch and German Rosicrucians.
The Sephardic bankers of Holland had orchestrated and then financed the rise to
power of Oliver Cromwell, who allowed the Jews to resurface in England, and
then William, Duke of Orange, who chartered the Bank of England as a means of
repayment to his benefactors.
By leveraging their capital stock in the
British East (Sepharad) India Company with their
existing holdings in the Dutch West (Ashkenaz)
India Company, the Jews soon gained control of the capital stock of the Bank of
England. This move corresponded with the Illumination of the Lodge of St. John
(the Pretender) by way of the Rosicrucians. Thus virtually all of Freemasonry was Judaized over the course of three centuries.
If one postulates this ultimate source of
intrigue as being the Bavarian Illuminati, a common assumption, we know that
their higher degrees were completed, not by Adam Weishaupt, but by the Baron
von Knigge. We have also learned that the Baron, who
had been Weishaupt's chief organizer and financier, was also a member of the Chabrath Zerek Boqer Aur, a much older
Jewish-Masonic lodge based in Frankfurt, which was also the point of origin for
the most powerful of the German-Jewish central bankers: the Rothschilds, the Speyers, the Oppenheimers, the Seligmans, the Habers and the Bethmanns.
Here we come up against a very real
force – the power to create money; and it is here that all of the threads that we have been discussing
come together at that same point, in time and place. But not
just yet. There is one more critical piece of evidence to be examined.
There is another book,
sacred to this tribe, called the Kabbalah. Its name literally means "a
welcome" – an initiation – for the Kabbalah is the key
to understanding the hidden cipher of the Hebrew Scriptures and Prophecies. The
"Secret Chiefs" of this tribe, descended as they are from magicians, Kabbalists and mystics, are dedicated to the task of
bringing about the fulfillment of these same prophecies. To this end, they have
learned to become masters of intrigue, deception, the sleight of hand, and the
inspiration of secret societies from the Knights Templar and the Rosicrucians to the Golden Dawn, Argenteum
Astrum and the O.T.O., because from time
immemorial the nations of the world have sought to discover the secret
knowledge of the Jews. It is not mere coincidence that the word
"cabal" is derived from the Hebrew Kabbalah.
It was in 917 C.E. that Aaron ben Samuel, a Babalonian scholar
and a Jew, arrived in Italy. He carried with him the texts and ancient oral
traditions of the Practical Kabbalists, known to have
existed at least as far back as the time of Solomon, who had himself been a
sorcerer. Whereas the Speculative Kabbalists were
well-known to be harmless mystics and holy men, the Practical Kabbalists were given over to the quest for worldly power,
becoming the Grand Masters of illusion, the arch-deceivers.
"Almost immediately upon his arrival, he imparted his mystical knowledge to the scholarly Kalonymus family. When they moved to the Rhineland in 917 c.e. they established what is now commonly referred to as German Kabbalism by some, and Early Hasidism by others. Until the time of Eleazar of Worms, the mystic doctrine transmitted by Aaron ben Samuel had been considered the private property of the Kalonymides. It was Judah he-Hasid (‘the Pious Jew’, died 1217), a member of the Kalonymides family, who directed his pupil Eleazar to reveal the oral and written doctrine to a larger audience."
Charled Ponce
Kabbalah: An Introduction
and Illumination for the World Today
In the meantime, a radical change had
swept through Europe and the yet more-civilized Islamic world. At the time of
Aaron ben Samuel, the Jews were in control of
virtually all commerce and banking throughout the Mediterranean, Northern
Europe and eastward as far as Pakistan. This was the Golden Age of
the Diaspora, when Jews had become privileged in virtually every court as
doctors, advisors, financiers, navigators, mapmakers, scribes (lawyers),
alchemists and astrologers. Then suddenly, with the start of the Crusades,
the Jews were set upon, cast down and slaughtered throughout the Christian
parts of the world.
The First Crusade, in 1095, was under the
military leadership of Godfrey de Bouillon. After the sack of Jerusalem in
1097, Godfrey, allegedly a Moravingian and Grand
Master of the newly-formed (1070 AD) Prieure
de Sion, co-founded the Knights Templar, an order
of warrior-monks drawn from the ranks of the nobility, for the purpose of
protecting pilgrims to the Holy Land.
Conventional history tends to skirt the
issue of why the Crusades. The "calls for help" from the Byzantine
Empire to fight the Turks have been perhaps overstated. The fortress of
Constantinople contained a vast hoard of wealth dating back to Alexander the
Great. The Byzantines could well-afford to hire on the Franks as mercenaries.
The Church needed to transfer the Frankish Knights' loyalty from the French
king to the Pope, and a Crusade provided the opportunity. While the main
Turkish force was arrayed against Byzantium, the Crusaders struck at the
exposed Turkish flank – Jerusalem!
There only remained the question of how
the Knights would be paid. King Baldwin was appointed Prince of Jerusalem
by the Holy See, the Knights Templar became his de-facto government, and they
immediately set about fortifying their newly-created kingdom with modern
castles built for them by the Masons. Within ten years, the Knights and an
affiliated organization, the Hospitallers, were to
amass a vast fortune in land, castles and merchant fleets, as well as a banking
monopoly that was protected by a special Papal dispensation allowing the
Knights to engage in usury.
This is the key to understanding the
Crusades: the rise in importance of merchant-banking. We must remember that, at
the time, intelligence-gathering was an important function of the traveling
merchant class, later called the merchant adventurers, and that the eleventh-century
bankers and caravan masters formed the nexus of what was to evolve into our
modern intelligence and banking apparatus.
The two functions are inextricable from
one another. By either providing or withholding information, they could
influence political affairs. And by the setting of rates of exchange, the
merchant bankers could either drain a city of its capital, or direct wealth and
commerce its way. And thus it was that the merchant bankers – who were
primarily Jews, and the upstart Venetians – were
rising to challenge the temporal power of the Papacy, and usurp its role as
king-maker. Thus both the aristocracy and the Papacy were threatened.
The ensuing call for Holy War was preached
across Europe by itinerant monks – such as the Benedictines, St. Bernard
and the Cistercians – who could whip the people of the towns they visited
into a religious frenzy. To purge Christendom of evil heresy, and to avenge the
"Blood of Christ", the mob would then be allowed into the Jewish
quarter. In the murder and rampage that ensued, the Crusader Knights would
suddenly appear on the scene as "Lords and Saviors" – and thus
whole armies could be marshaled "on-the-fly". And the occasion also
demonstrated to the Jews how, during the Knights' absence on Crusade, there
would be no one to protect them from the next mob, which could be summoned at
any time by the Church.
And so, while on their way to the Holy
Land, Godfrey and the Knights of the Prieure
de Sion had quietly strong-armed their way into
the Jewish merchant-banking establishment, and taken over the operation. This
was Pope Urban II's "Rough Wooing" of the
Jews. After the first blood-letting, the surviving Jews were kept on as
tax-gatherers, banking associates, war financiers, and brokers for converting
loot into wealth. And it does make military sense, before marching off to fight
the Turks, that one first "put the Jews in their place".
So it is fair to say that a great
portion of the Templar wealth had been stolen from the Jews,
or that the Papacy had handed over the Jewish merchant-banking
"franchise" to the Knights Templar in payment for their services; but
the situation goes still deeper than that. From the captive Jews' perspective,
while the Pope had indeed put a sword to their throats, the Templars
helped to bring in new business, in fact, a great deal of new business –
and it turned out that St. Bernard the antisemite was
also a very talented salesman. This was the beginning of a very strange
relationship ... for the Knights Templar and the Jews were becoming
merchant-banking partners!
The Prieure
de Sion, parent organization to the Knights
Templar, had actually been established before the First Crusade, and very
likely to gather and evaluate Jewish & Islamic esoterica
(the location in Languedoc was ideal to this purpose) – as a sort of
counter-intelligence operation – and to report directly to the Pope. The
Jews had simply become too powerful in Europe, the Holy Roman Empire that had
been created by Charlemagne was beginning to break up, and the Papacy was
trying to draw the center of power from Paris to Rome. The Franks were to be
amalgamated into the Holy Roman Empire, and their power absorbed by the Church.
Thus it was intended that the Knights
Templar become an independent body, in order that they be removed from the
French king's authority. At what point the confiscation of the Jewish
merchant-banking establishment occurs is merely a question of opportunity. It
was done when it could be done. The dates traditionally given
for the foundation of the Knights Templar record stages in this accomplishment.
But something else was happening that, in
all likelihood, the Papacy had not foreseen. As the Templars
began to learn the art of merchant-banking from their Jewish captives, they
also began to assimilate the apocryphal and esoteric knowledge of the Jews. The
Templars were becoming crypto-Jews themselves! In
time, they would be seen as the "bad boys" of Christendom (from the
Papal perspective) because of their willingness to deal with heretics.
There was still more at stake. Not only
were the Knights stealing the Jewish banking enterprise, the Church was
attempting to steal the Jewish mystique. The Crusades were being
transformed by Urban II and his successors into a "Christian" attempt
at creating a counterfeit Zion, a false fulfillment of the Hebrew Prophecies.
The amalgamation of the Franks is a perfect example of this. The Church
succeeded with the Franks, but ultimately failed in her enterprise; the next
attempt would be made by the Freemasons, the successors to the Knights Templar,
in a later age.
Neither was this the first attempt at a
counterfeit Zion: Saul of Tarsus had long ago set about doing much the same
thing with the early Christians, when he created the Church in the first place.
The other thing to understand is the
difference between the Knights Templar and the Hospitallers. The Templars were both
a military and a religious order, and they took a vow of chastity. The Hospitallers were not required to do this. And while the Templars were drawn into dealings with first Jews, and
later Turks, Arabs, Egyptians and Moors, the Hospitallers
remained aloof, thus displaying complete loyalty to their Pope, content to be
his pit-bulls on a leash. The Templars were
too-quickly becoming independent-minded, as we said, more willing to compromise
with heretics. And so, when tending to their own
business matters, the Hospitallers tended to align
themselves with the Venetians.
So a rift had appeared within Christendom:
on the one hand the Hospitallers and the Venetians,
and on the other the Templars and the Jews. Urban II
had perhaps bitten off more than he could chew. He had acted out of opportunism
if not desperation, and he was never in a position to seize the entire Jewish
Nation.
The Crusades had not yet ventured into
Iberia (Spain) or Poland. The Sephardic Jews still controlled a
merchant-banking network that extended from Spain across Africa to Egypt, and
from Poland across the Ottoman Empire to Arabia, and from Babylon eastwards
almost to China. Sooner or later they would avenge their loss to the
Christians. In the meantime, the Knights Templar had acquired the largest
portion: they controlled money and trade from the Eastern Mediterranean to
Italy and across Western Europe as far as the British Isles. But within this
trade-zone, the Venetians and Hospitallers controlled
the sea lanes from Cyprus to Rhodes to Malta. This dynamic equilibrium was to
last for nearly two centuries.
The Templars
also had, from time to time, alternative trade routes (courtesy of their Jewish
partners) running through Constantinople, and through
Alexandria to Tunis and Sicily. And so they were not entirely at the Venetians'
mercy. But the Templars' prestige ultimately rested
upon their presence in the Holy Land, or at least Cyprus (necessitating the
goodwill of the Hospitallers), and a working
relationship with their Jewish merchant-bankers. Over time, that working
relationship grew to a sort of fondness (if not necessarily for the Sephardim),
at least for Jews in general. Oh, did they repent the bloodbath of Godfroi — too late! It was about this time that
the Kabbalist works that had been brought to the Kalonymides family by Aaron ben
Samuel two centuries earlier began to surface.
The notion that there existed apocryphal
books that unlocked the secrets of the Hebrew Prophecies was
irresistible to such as the Templars, and also to the
Masons, the Hospitallers and the Venetians, the Pope,
and all his anointed monarchs of Europe. Of course, the complete Kabbala was known only to the Kalonymides
(and also their Sephardic brethren) at the time, while the Templars
were shown only tantalizing bits and pieces. Before long, the Jewish servants
were becoming the teachers, and the Templars began to
quietly accept Jews into their ranks for the purpose of the knowledge and power
to be gained. And not only they. The hofjuden were also beginning to rise in various
European courts, at the invitation of aristocratic patrons. These are the
beginnings of "Christian Kabbalism".
By degrees, as the apocryphia
released by the Kalonymides were
"discovered" by Papal spies, the Crusades were transformed – by
the Papacy itself – into a campaign against heresy, and the Christian
Knights were redirected against brother Christians!
The horrors of the Albegensian
Crusade are but the clearest example, the Fourth Crusade another. Following the
military setbacks and blunders that were more frequently occurring, the Templar
Knights were forced to abandon Jerusalem. Most of them went to southern France,
to live among Diaspora Jews and the surviving Cathars,
but this upset the balance of power, threatening both the French king and
Papacy in Rome. The Hospitallers more fortuitously
entrenched themselves on the islands of Cyprus, Rhodes and Malta to await the
outcome.
Philippe the Fair, King of France, had his
own solution to the problem. Rather than wait for the Jews and Templars to play him off against the Pope, he would seize
the Papacy and crush the Templars, behind whom hid the Jews. By murder and intrigue (and most likely
with Venetian assistance) he eliminated two popes and placed his puppet Clement
V on the Papal Throne. Meanwhile, it appears that Edward I of England
surmised Philippe's intent (with Venetian assistance), and correctly gauged the
wind, because in 1301 he expelled the Jews from England and commenced
his war against Scotland.
The Jews, if not the Templars,
understood that Philippe was at the heart of the affair, and they endeavored to
undermine his power by collapsing his currency, and they succeeded in
devaluating this by 65%. That event set off civil rioting in Paris, and
Philippe was forced to seek refuge in the Paris temple in 1305. That the Templars did not simply throw Philippe to the dogs is
evidence that they were either receiving faulty intelligence (the Venetians?)
or that they didn't believe what the Jews were telling them. For whatever
reason, it appears that the Knights Templar were increasingly the dupes.
In 1306, Philip the Fair attacked the
Jews and expelled them from his kingdom. This was a direct blow to the Templar infrastructure, because without
their Jewish partners, the Templars would be unable
to maintain their financial empire, especially with the Venetians nipping at
their heels. The Templars were caught in a trap. If
they defend the Jews, they would be sealing their own fate, aligning themselves
with heretics and worse. Up to this point they had refrained from killing
fellow Christians, and the latter Crusades had been primarily Venetian and Hospitaller adventures. For the Templars
now to draw swords against Christendom would destroy whatever good the Order
had accomplished. They had but little choice save stoically face their doom.
What is amazing is that we never see the
two events linked. The Masonic accounts of the Templar martyrdom generally
overlook the preceding Jewish expulsion, as do Jewish historians
overlook the subsequent Templar event. Yet the two cannot be separated.
On Friday, 13th of October, 1307,
Philippe the Fair suddenly arrested all of the Knights Templar in his realm that he could lay hands upon, put
them to the torture, and extracted confessions of heresy and worse. They were
then handed over to the Inquisition of Pope Clement V, which upheld the
convictions and had the Knights burned at the stake. Jaques
DeMolay, then Grand Master of the Prieure
de Sion, was among the martyrs. To this day,
Freemasonry still swears to avenge his death.
The properties confiscated from the Templars were divided by Philip and the Venetians, with the
Hospitallers inheriting a substantial portion therefrom, but much appears to have slipped quickly through
their fingers. The more successful of the Hospitallers
and their families later became prominent Papal and Swiss bankers. The famed
Knights of Malta also came from their ranks, and many Jesuits. It appears
that Christopher Columbus had been a Knight Hospitaller who was married, as we shall see, to
the daughter of a Grand Master of the Knights of Christ, one of the Templars' successors.
Some of the surviving Knights Templar had
escaped to Argyll in Scotland, where they received protection from their
allies, the Masons; this was the beginning of the "Accepted" rites of
Freemasonry, the admission of non-stonemasons into the Masonic lodges. Others
fled to Portugal and Spain, and still others to Germany and Poland. Many of
these resumed their ties with Diaspora Jewery, and
thus remained in contact with Kabbalistic teachings,
which were now taking root in fertile soil [2].
Shortly after the Templar expulsions, as
we mentioned, another order of Christian Kabbalists,
the Rosicrucians, began to emerge among the
aristocracy in Central Europe. This is sometimes referred to as The Order of
Strict Observance, which claimed a Templar heritage, and was a forerunner
to the Illuminati. They continued the search for hidden knowledge, intent on
unlocking the secrets of the Kabbalah, parts of which were still missing
from their hands. Interestingly, there was an active Jewish presence in Poland,
Austria, Hungary, Provence, the Palatine and the
Papal States at the same time, reflected in the rise of the hofjuden,
or court-Jews in these same countries.
As the Protestant Reformation began to
sweep across northern Europe in the 16th century, the Sephardic Jews and conversos were allowed back into the Protestant
kingdoms, notably Holland, Denmark, Germany and the
Hague. In France, the Houses of Guise and Lorraine remained outwardly Roman
Catholic, but they had secretly embraced Rosicrucianism
and were conspiring to capture the French throne. The Sephardic bankers quickly
reestablished themselves as the most prominent merchant-financiers in Northern
Europe; and this facilitated the infiltration of Jewish Kabbalists
into the expanding Rosicrucian societies.
John Dee, Robert Fludd
and others brought the Rosicrucian teachings to England during the reign of
Elizabeth and, following the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588, Jewish and
Flemish mercers began to appear in more frequent numbers among the
merchant-adventurers of London. By the time James I ascended to the throne,
beginning the reign of the House of Stuart, Rosicrucians
were firmly entrenched within British Freemasonry, and by 1630 a Rosicrucian
college had been established in London.
This is where things get interesting. For some reason, the Sephardic merchant-bankers wanted to unseat the Stuart Dynasty, and they began an economic a