|

There are changes in the wind.
Some people may be happy, some may be unhappy. Let's go directly to the Talmud
to see its laws on some social concerns.

Rabbi Menachem Mendel
Schneerson, (2) the
Lubavitcher Rebbe, 1902-1994. His birthday has been regularly recognized by
special Congressional declarations. These were effected by declaring his
birthday "Education Day." The proclamations go as far back as 1976.
Rabbi Schneerson's name appears in every bill and the date moves about on the
Julian calendar to follow the wandering cycles of the Babylonian lunar
calendar used by Judaism. In 1991, Congress coupled Rabbi Schneerson's
birthday recognition with a declaration stating that the Talmud Noahide Laws
are "the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was
founded". — US
Congress (1)
The package on the Rebbe's forehead is a tephillin
(or phylactery) which, as described by Reverend Dr. Abraham Cohen,
"consists of two small leather cases with straps attached, in each of
which is inserted parchment inscribed with four Biblical passages: Exod.
xiii. 1-10, 11-16; Deut.
vi. 4-9, xi.
13-21. That is the traditional method of fulfilling the law: 'Thou shalt
bind them for a sign upon thine hand, and they shall be for frontlets between
thine eyes.' (Deut.
vi. 8)" — Reverend Dr. Cohen (3)

Antonin Scalia, Supreme Court judge, is said to be a devout Catholic
with a fascination for Jewish law. Under circumstances that are not
explained, Justice Scalia developed a correspondence with Rabbi Noson Gurary
(a disciple of the late Rabbi Schneerson). During this exchange, Scalia
mentioned his "fascination with Jewish law." That prompted Rabbi
Garary to found the National Institute for Judaic Law (NIJL). (45) The
Institute promotes courses on Talmud-based law in American law schools and
otherwise injects Talmud-based law into American society.
The founding of NIJL was celebrated by a
gala kosher dinner on November 5,
2002. Justice Scalia and two other Supreme Court judges were among
200 dinner guests. Where was the dinner held? In the Supreme Court building.

Site of Kosher Banquet
The American public first learned of the
Supreme Court kosher dinner by reading the news in The Jerusalem Post,
November 9, 2002. (45) This
remarkable event was not reported contemporaneously by either The
Washington Post or The Washington Times. Missing from The
Jerusalem Post coverage was the role Scalia may have played in securing
the use of the Supreme Court building as a banquet hall for Rabbi Gurary.
Why a devout Catholic like Justice Scalia
would promote Talmud-based law is not clear. The Talmud classifies Christians
as idolaters, and the Noahide regulations require that idolaters — devout
Catholics, for example, people exactly like Justice Scalia — be put to death.
Could it be that Rabbi Gurary did not tell Justice Scalia about the Noahide
provisions to execute people like Scalia?
Justice Scalia has demonstrated a soft
spot for Judaism in other ways. He was the first judge to use the world chutzpah
in a Supreme Court decision. (41)
According to an article in Jewish Law,
"… Justice Scalia … has repeatedly called for more expressions of
tradition and religion in American society. The use of the word chutzpah,
with its historical roots and association with Judaism, may fulfill such a
role. It also comports with his legal philosophy. He favors the
'nonpreferentialist' view, which posits that government may support religion
in general but not in a way that prefers any particular religion. For Justice
Scalia to use a term of a Jewish cultural language in a Supreme Court
decision could be viewed as in keeping with the nonpreferentialist legal
doctrine." — Jewish Law (54)
The word chutzpah is not a
religious word, nor is it a traditional American word. It is a Yiddish word
meaning, roughly, "unmitigated gall." It is surprising that Jewish
Law would attach such significance to the incidental use of a Yiddish
word.
If given a judicial opportunity, will
Justice Scalia rule in favor of the Noahide Laws? He could describe them as
"nonpreferentialist," in the much the same way that Congress
described them as "the bedrock of society from the dawn of
civilization." That sounds most "nonpreferentialist," provided
one does not mention death sentences for Christians. 
Equal Justice Under Law
Talmud law also provides that Jews and
non-Jews be judged by dramatically different standards. For example, in
capital cases, 23 judges must sit in judgment on a Jew; two eyewitnesses must
have witnessed the offense, and warned him of the potential penalty. In
contrast, a Gentile gets one judge, and is convicted on the testimony of one
eyewitness with no warnings. See US v. Talmud Law
for more details on capital cases. See The Talmud Lives for
Jews for details on civil cases.
Justice Scalia has sworn an oath to uphold
the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Given that the words Equal
Justice Under Law are emblazoned over the cornice of the very building that
houses Scalia's office, Justice Scalia is one Very Interesting Person.

Neatly separating head from
shoulders with a single blow of the axe …
"… in speaking of heathens, when the
Tanna teaches that they are forbidden to do something, he ipso facto
teaches that it is punishable by death; for only in speaking of Jews is it
necessary to distinguish between prohibition and punishment." — Rabbi
Dr. Freedman
"… every death penalty decreed for
the sons of Noah is only by decapitation." — Sanhedrin 56a

Rabbi Yitzchok Adlerstein is the director of Project Next Step of the Simon
Wiesenthal Center
in Los Angeles and a professor of
Jewish Law and Ethics at Loyola Law
School. Rabbi Adlerstein calls the
Talmud, "the world's oldest continuously-practiced legal code." (55)
"For a Jew to be convicted by a
Jewish court, two eyewitnesses must have seen the perpetrator about to commit
the crime and warned him of the potential penalty. The murderer must verbally
answer that he chooses to proceed anyway. (For a non-Jew, only one witness is
required and no verbal warning.)" (57)
We can see why a Jew on trial for his life
might prefer a Jewish court — but why would a non-Jew? What would
Talmud-based law have to offer that is better than trial by a jury of peers,
the Bill of Rights, and Equal Justice Under Law?

The National Menorah is now an annual feature on the Ellipse, adjacent to
the White House in Washington, DC
— it is part of the government-sponsored Christmas/ Hanukkah/ Winter
Solstice/ Kwanzaa festivities.

The Washington Times, Monday,
December 12, 2002, carried a front-page picture and story above
the fold of the lighting of the National Menorah. The caption reads:
"From left, Rabbi Abraham Shemtov, Rabbi Levi Shemtov, and
Undersecretary of Defense Dov Zakheim lit the National Menorah on the Ellipse
from a cherry picker to mark the third night of Hanukkah, last night."
All three men are Friends of Lubavitch. Other friends of Chabad Lubavitch
include former Press Secretary to President Bush Ari Fleischer, and Senator
Joseph Lieberman, (D-CT), a possible candidate for the US
presidency.

The Washington Times, Monday,
December 12, 2002, (detail).
The box carrying the men reads,
"Hanukkah - Friends of Lubavitch." As careful as the White House is
in their public relations of all matters religious, this seems to be a clear
message to the nation: of the three rabbis, all are Orthodox.
"In the struggle for the soul of
American Jewry, the Orthodox model has triumphed." — Samuel G. Freedman (52)
Dov Zakheim is Comptroller of the
Pentagon, and an ordained Orthodox rabbi. He is also the Department of
Defense "point man" in charge of "rebuilding a terrorist-free Afghanistan"
for the Muslim Afghanis. — AFIS (68)

US President George W. Bush "sent greetings and applauded the institute for
promoting an 'understanding of Judaism's rich tradition of legal thought. As
we face new challenges and welcome new opportunities, our society must
continue to promote good character and strong values. Through the study and
teaching of Jewish law and philosophy you are contributing to a growing
culture of service, citizenship, and responsibility in America,'
Bush wrote."
The occasion was a kosher dinner held at
the US Supreme Court Building in Washington, DC
by the National Institute of Judaic Law to celebrate the occasion of the
Institute's founding. According to the Jerusalem Post, the purpose of the
Institute is to teach Judaic law to US law students and jurists, and to file
legal opinions in US courts. (44)

Mel Gibson is a practicing Roman Catholic Christian. Gibson is
currently making a movie about the last day in the life of Jesus.
On March
24, 3003, Abraham Foxman, the National Director of the
Anti-Defamation League, wrote Gibson a letter, issuing a thinly veiled demand
that Gibson submit his script or a precise for ADL approval. "… we
have serious concerns … and would like to be assured … Passion plays have an
infamous history of leading to hatred, violence, and even death of
Jews."(62)
On the other hand, the ADL publishes a
speech given by the First Lady of New York,
Mrs.
George (Libby) Pataki. Mrs. Pataki gave her speech upon the acceptance of
an award given to her by the ADL for her unwavering support of Israel.
In her speech, Mrs. Pataki denounced the Koran and those who practice the
Islamic religion. She identified Islam with terrorism, saying in part:
"It leaves us at war with an enemy
that has no conscience. They do not deal in reality with statistics and
facts. They deal in rhetoric filled with hatred and founded in ignorance.
They praise murderers as martyrs. The speak peace and buy illegal weapons …
They TARGET women and children for death …
" The fight is not just about Israel.
It is about all people that hate terror and love peace. It is about freedom
and the right to live one's life without fear. Under the Taliban in Afghanistan,
women were forbidden to hold jobs, drive cars, own land, be educated, and for
that matter, show their face. They were forbidden from doing things by the
Koran, which ironically they are not even allowed to read. If their husband
dies they have no way to feed their children. Sometimes, the women beg for
enough money to buy stale bread, which they mix with water and feed to their
children. In other families the women were forced into prostitution and then
charged and executed for the same offense. If any of you have seen Saira
Shaw's 'Beneath the Veil,' you know what I am talking about." (65)
Does the ADL worry that First Lady
Pataki's message might lead to the "hatred, violence, and even
death" of Muslims? We are left with the following alternatives. Either:
a) The ADL is publicizing Mrs. Pataki's
speech to incite "hatred, violence, and even death" against Muslim
Americans — or
b) The ADL is entirely cynical about the
consequences of so-called hate speech.
Abraham
H. Foxman is the National Director of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).
The ADL web page carries these words from Mrs. Pataki:
"As a premier civil rights and human
relations agency, ADL combats anti-Semitism and racism against all peoples,
regardless of background." (65)
We're puzzled. As far as we know, the ADL
did not send a letter of protest to Congress when it declared the Talmud's
Noahide Laws were the basis "upon which our great Nation was
founded." Noahide Law regulations call for the decapitation of
practicing Christians — people like Mel Gibson.

Richard Gephardt, Missouri District 3, served as Democratic Leader of the
U.S. House of Representatives, Majority Leader of the House, and as one of
the nation's leading Democrats for much of the last two decades.
On March 05, 1991, Rep. Gephardt
co-sponsored H.J. Res. 104, which reads in part as follows:
"Whereas Congress recognizes the
historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of
civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded; Whereas these
ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn
of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws …"
— US Congress (1)

Congressman Robert Michel (R-Ill.) was first elected in 1956 to the 85th
Congress from the 18th congressional district in Illinois.
He served from his election in 1956 until his retirement in 1994. He was
Minority Whip from the 94th Congress through the 96th. He served as Minority
Leader, though he preferred the title Republican Leader, from the 97th
through the 103rd Congress.
Rep. Michel was co-sponsor of the 1991
declaration concerning the Noahide Laws, along with Rep. Gephardt.

Anthony Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union,
is quoted in The Washington
Post caption to this picture, "At the most personal level, I love
this country like nothing else."
The ACLU has concerned itself with First
Amendment issues in America
for almost a century. An advanced search of the ACLU site with google.com
reveals 776 references to the Ten Commandments. For example:
"The ACLU opposes the display of the
Ten Commandments in public schools, classrooms, and in other public
institutions on the ground that such displays violate the First Amendment."
However, a Google search of the ACLU site
does not reveal a single mention of the Noahide/ Noachide/ Noachian Laws.
Explanations vary for this singular
disinterest. One commentator suggested, "The ACLU concerns itself with
Freedom of Speech issues; in contrast, the Noahide Laws involve the freedom
to breathe, and that falls outside the ACLU's special interest."

Do you know the difference between
Talmud and Torah as those words are used by religious Jews? The
terms are confusing and if they are confused, no one will understand what is
being said. Find out from Critical Words of
Talmud Study. (49)


Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, a Kabbalist, is a disciple of the late Rabbi Menachem
Mendel Schneerson. He is friends with Uri Geller, Madonna, and Michael
Jackson. According to ABC News, "Boteach's … rabbinical answer to
Dr. Ruth began with the 1999 publication of Kosher Sex, a best seller
that shook the Orthodox Jewish community for stressing, among other things,
that oral sex can be very good for a marriage." — ABC (75)
Rabbi Boteach is quoted on the dust jacket
of his book, Judaism for Everyone, saying, "Sex is the holiest
human experience, the highest form of knowledge."
In Judaism for Everyone, Rabbi
Boteach says that Judaism views Christianity as the "Ultimate
Heresy" and says he finds tolerance "repugnant."
"From the outset Judaism aimed to
destroy the idols and false Gods that ancient man was wont to worship.
Therefore, no visual images can ever be employed in prayer and religious
devotions." — Rabbi Boteach (16)

The Bamayan Buddhas in Afghanistan
were destroyed in February 2001, allegedly by the Taliban. It is alleged this
statuary was destroyed because Muslims do not like idols. There is room to
doubt the allegation, however: Egypt
has been occupied by Muslims for more than a thousand years, yet the
extensive heathen statuary of ancient Egypt
has never been attacked by an Egyptian government.

Emperor Leo III of the Byzantine ruled from 717 to 741. Following the
second Mosaic Commandment forbidding "graven images," Leo
instituted a campaign that destroyed much of the arts of that day in Easter
Europe.


Crucifix by Giotto di Bondone's 1292 in Florence.
(38)
Rabbi Boteach says that the religious
images of Christianity are in violation of fundamental tenets of Judaism. In
particular, the rabbi names the crucifix as objectionable. This causes some
concern about the safety of Christian artifacts in the upcoming Jewish
Millennium. "From the outset Judaism aimed to destroy the idols …"
— Rabbi Boteach (16)
"Therefore, no visual
images …"

"… can ever be employed
…"

"… in prayer and religious
devotions." — Rabbi Boteach (16)

MISHNAH. He who engages in idol-worship [is executed]. It is
all one whether he serve it, sacrifice, offer incense, make libations,
prostrate himself, accept it as a god, or say to it, 'thou art my God' … — Babylonian Talmud, Tractate
Sanhedrin 60b

Dennis Prager wrote of Rabbi Boteach's book, Judaism for Everyone:
"A major achievement. Few books on
Judaism convey its essence as clearly, as interestingly, as humanly as Judaism
for Everyone." — Dennis Prager
According to Dennis Prager's web page, "Dennis
Prager has engaged in interfaith dialogue with Catholics at the Vatican,
Muslims in the Persian Gulf Hindus in India,
and Protestants at Christian seminaries throughout America.
For ten years, he conducted a weekly interfaith dialogue on radio, with
representatives of virtually every religion in the world. New
York's Jewish Week described Dennis Prager as 'one of
the three most interesting minds in American Jewish Life.'" (53)

Rabbi Daniel Lapin is author of America's
Real War. He presents himself as a friend of the Christian right, and is
a favorite speaker of organizations such as Concerned Women for America.
"As an Orthodox rabbi, I will make a
compelling case for America
as a Christian nation and the need for our nation to be based on
Judeo-Christian ethic in order to survive." — Rabbi Daniel Lapin
In his book, Rabbi Lapin promotes the
Noahide Laws, but fails to tell his Christian readership that the Noahide
system requires Christians to be put to death for practicing Christianity.

The Stumbling Block
Rabbi Lapin also mentions the Jewish
prohibition against putting a "stumbling block before the blind" —
that is, deriving benefit from information deliberately withheld from
another. "Thus we see that part of the Jewish contribution to the world
has always included 'filling in the blanks.'" — Rabbi Lapin(29)
Selling the world on Noahide Laws and not
mentioning the penalty clause — that sounds kind of like a stumbling block,
doesn't it?
Don't you wish Rabbi Lapin would
"fill in the blanks"?

You can help in the battle for Truth, Justice, and the American
Way! Fight the forces of censorship and
suppression of the Talmud, and bring about understanding between peoples of
different faiths.
Download this
site to your desktop computer. Make CDs and
distribute them to friends, neighbors, ministers, and community leaders. Email your
favorite essay to your email list. Post your favorite
essay to discussion forums. Print your
favorite essays and give them to those not on the Internet. Flyers
advertising Come-and-Hear.com can be distributed throughout your community.
Genuine Come and Hear™ CDs do not contain executable programs.
When making CDs, do not include any files that end in .exe, .com, .bat, .vbs,
.doc, .pif, .sit, or .scr. The person receiving the CD should use his own
browser to view the files. This helps to protect him from harmful programs
and viruses.

Research Windfall.
The recurring Congressional resolutions honoring Rabbi Schneerson and
recognizing the Noahide laws as the basis of our great Nation have been
gathered. This collection is a must if you would like to discuss it with your
neighbors and be a part of the process. (1)
Max
Dimont, author of several books
popularizing Jewish history and culture writes in The Indestructible Jews,
that:
"Jewish history consists of a unique
series of events — accidental or purposive — which have had the practical
effect of preserving the Jews … to fulfill their avowed mission of ushering
in a brotherhood of man.
"Whether this mission was initiated
by God or retroactively attributed to God by the Jews themselves in no way
alters our thesis of a Jewish manifest destiny." (47)
Dimont also quotes Prime Minister Ben
Gurion:
"My concept of the messianic idea is
not a metaphysical but a social-cultural one … I believe in our moral and
intellectual superiority, in our capacity to serve as a model for the
redemption of the human race … The glory of the Divine Presence is within us,
in our hearts, and not outside us." (47)

Rabbi Noson Gurary is a Chabad Lubavitch rabbi, Director of Chabad of Buffalo,
New York, and founder of the
National Institute for Judaic Law. The Institute is intended to bring
Talmudic law to the attention of US judges and law students. According to
Jewish Week:
"'It will be an eye opener for
judges, scholars and law students,' he told The Jewish Week. 'Before you know
where you're going, you have to know where you came from. And Jewish law is
the basis of our legal system in America.'
Gurary said that the idea for the institute came in an exchange of letters in
which Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, one of the most conservative
Justices, expressed his 'fascination with Jewish law.' 'And as a teacher of
Judaic studies, I began to see the excitement of students who were being
exposed to Jewish law for the first time, who now had a better understanding
of where Western law come from,' Gurary said.
"Gurary, who teaches at the University
of Buffalo law school, said his
target audience includes judges around the country and law students, not
politicians and lawmakers." (45)
|
For Jews, the belief that God
can be human
is the ultimate heresy.
— Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, on
Christianity (7)
Minuth — Heresy, the belief in
more than one Power,
especially Judeo-Christianity.
— Soncino Talmud
Glossary
Unbeknownst to most Americans,
the US Congress has been gradually changing the fundamentals of American law.
The movement for change started as early as 1975, when Congress passed a
resolution honoring the birthday of a prominent rabbi, Rabbi Menachem Mendel
Schneerson, ("the Rebbe") of the Chabad Lubavitch sect (sometimes
this sect is called "ultra-Orthodox"). The movement ratcheted
forward in 1991, when Congress coupled Rabbi Schneerson's happy birthday
message with a declaration that the United States of America was founded on
the seven Noahide Laws. (1)
The Noahide Laws promise
deadly consequences for Christians. We shall understand why a little later.
What are the seven Noahide
Laws? In brief: LORD God told the Jews they must obey 613 commandments (72) in
order to have everlasting life (i.e., "a portion in
the-world-to-come"), but decreed that the rest of mankind must obey only
seven commandments. Those seven commandments are the Noahide Laws.
Furthermore, LORD God tasked the Jews to enforce the seven Noahide
Commandments, and to enforce them with liberal use of the death penalty.
While we read of LORD God
writing the Ten Commandments on stone tablets with his finger and giving them
to Moses (Exodus
31:18, 34:28),
there is no parallel Biblical statement of LORD God writing the Noahide Laws
on stone tablets and giving them to anybody. Jews believe that the Noahide
Laws were either passed down orally (see More
Critical Words of Talmud Study, Oral Law), or derived by rabbis (see Israel's "One
Indigenous Science" [50]). The
authority of the Noahide Laws is not questioned, however. (37)
Here is an excerpt from the
1991 Congressional declaration concerning the Noahide Laws:
Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of
ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and
upon which our great Nation was founded;
Whereas these ethical values and
principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization,
when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;
…
Whereas the Lubavitch movement has
fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the
world;
Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson,
leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and
his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;
Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual
leader, `the rebbe', this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of
`education and giving', the year in which we turn to education and charity to
return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven
Noahide Laws; and
Whereas this will be reflected in an
international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States
and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of
Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is
designated as `Education Day, U.S.A.'. The President is requested to issue a
proclamation calling upon the people of the United
States to observe such day with appropriate
ceremonies and activities.
— US
Congress, HR 104 Public Law 102-14 (1)
Despite this Congressional
declaration, many Americans are still not aware that their country was
founded on Talmudic laws. (70) It is
still widely believed that America
was founded on the principles contained in the Declaration of Independence,
the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, and Anglo-Saxon law generally. Some of
the Founding Fathers even thought they had been influenced by the writings of
John Locke, a Scot. Help clear up this misunderstanding. A copy of that 1991
resolution, Joint House Resolution 104 Public Law 102-14, and prior
Congressional Schneerson birthday resolutions are available for easy download
and study. (1)
|
|
|
Congressional Gold Medal (brass replica) awarded posthumously
to Rabbi Schneerson in August 1994. The legend on the obverse reads
"Benevolence Ethics Leadership Scholarship" in English, and
"To improve the home" in Hebrew.
|
To see how one of Judaism's
most prominent and charming spokesmen is currently promoting the Noahide
Laws, study the May 8, 2001
speech of the Very Reverend the Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew
Congregations of the British Commonwealth, Professor
Jonathan Sacks. The speech is entitled Jewish Identity — The Concept of a
Chosen People. (42)
A
Description of the Noahide Laws
The Noahide Laws are defined
in the Talmud, largely in Chapter VII of Tractate Sanhedrin, particularly: 56a, 56b,
and 57a.
(Note: When excerpting
quotations from the Talmud, we sometimes omit non-germane text and footnotes.
An omission of text is indicated by an ellipsis (…). To see the full text and
footnotes, follow the hot link at the end of the excerpt. It is our pleasure
to make available on line a number of Talmud tractates, so that excerpts used
in these Come and Hear™ articles and Elizabeth's Dilling's The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
can be seen in full context. We indicate unprintable Hebrew characters,
words, and phrases with the symbol [H].)
GEMARA. …
Our Rabbis taught: seven precepts were the sons of Noah commanded: social
laws; to refrain from blasphemy, idolatry; adultery; bloodshed; robbery; and
eating flesh cut from a living animal …
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate
Sanhedrin 56a
Soncino 1961 Edition, pages 381-382
A contemporary promoter of the
Noahide Laws, Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, is a Hasidic Jew, a Kabbalist, (43) and a
disciple of the late Rabbi Schneerson. (58) Rabbi Boteach
expresses the Noahide Laws in this language:
The Jews have the 613 commandments of the Torah to
observe. Non-Jews have the Noahide commandments, included within which are
prohibitions against idolatry, theft, murder, adultery and incest, cruelty to
animals, blasphemy and the responsibility to establish and maintain courts of
justice in a just society.
— Rabbi Boteach (9)
Jewish
Law Enforced on Non-Jews
In the following Talmud
excerpt, we see that Jews have Divine authority to enforce the Noahide Laws
on non-Jews.
GEMARA. … If
a heathen [son of Noah] blasphemed, employing substitutes of the ineffable
Name, he is in the opinion of the Sages punishable by death. Why so? —
Because it is written, as well the stranger, as he that is born in the
land [when he blasphemeth the name of the Lord, shall be put to death].
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate
Sanhedrin 56a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 381
One
Witness — Death for Gentile
Rabbi Yitzchok Adlerstein is
the director of Project Next Step of the Simon
Wiesenthal Center
in Los Angeles and a professor of
Jewish Law and Ethics at Loyola Law
School. Rabbi Adlerstein presents
the basic principle of equal protection under Jewish law.
For a Jew to be convicted by a Jewish court, two
eyewitnesses must have seen the perpetrator about to commit the crime and
warned him of the potential penalty. The murderer must verbally answer that
he chooses to proceed anyway. (For a non-Jew, only one witness is required
and no verbal warning.)
— Rabbi Adlerstein, as told to Naomi Pfefferman (57)
So then, Jewish law is not
based on "Equal Justice for All." Different standards are used to
judge Jews and non-Jews. To convict a Gentile, all that is needed is one
accuser. See US
v. Talmud Law for further discussion. (66) Thus,
it is very easy to convict a Gentile, but much more difficult to convict a
Jew.
Now the Talmud Sages tell us
that a single judge decides a Gentile's fate. There is no provision for a
jury in Talmud law.
GEMARA. … R.
Jacob b. Aha found it written in the scholars' Book of Aggada: A heathen is
executed on the ruling of one judge, on the testimony of one witness, without
a formal warning, on the evidence of a man, but not of a woman, even if he
[the witness] be a relation. On the authority of R. Ishmael it was said: [He
is executed] even for the murder of an embryo. Whence do we know all this? —
Rab Judah answered: The Bible saith, And surely your blood of your lives will
I require; this shows that even one judge [may try a heathen].
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate
Sanhedrin 57b
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 390
Gentiles
Executed for Violating Noahide Laws
Here the rabbis argue and
decide that heathens are put to death for idolatry, and any other violation
of the Seven Laws, as well:
GEMARA. …
With respect to idolatry, such acts for which a Jewish court decrees sentence
of death [on Jewish delinquents] are forbidden to the heathen. This implies
that they are merely forbidden, but their violation is not punished by death!
- R. Nahman b. Isaac answered: Their prohibition is their death sentence. (1)
R. Huna, Rab Judah, and all the disciples
of Rab maintained: A heathen is executed for the violation of the seven
Noachian laws; the Divine Law having revealed this of one [murder], it
applies to all.
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate
Sanhedrin 57a
Soncino 1961 Edition, pages 387-388
The translator, Rabbi Dr. H.
Freedman, amplifies the text in a footnote:
1.
I.e., in speaking of
heathens, when the Tanna teaches that they are forbidden to do something, he ipso
facto teaches that it is punishable by death; for only in speaking of
Jews is it necessary to distinguish between prohibition and punishment.
— Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman
Death
Sentence Endorsed Today
It would be a mistake to
believe that contemporary promoters of the Noahide Laws have abandoned the
Talmud doctrine that idolaters (i.e., Christians) be put to death for
practicing their religion. The Noah's Covenant web site calls for the
banning of Christmas and other Christian holidays, and endorses the call for
the death sentence for Christians. Noah's Covenant quotes Rabbi
Schneerson from Volume VIII of Likkutei Sichos, an anthology of the
Schneerson's works. (71) Rabbi
Schneerson in turn quotes Maimonides (the Rambam).
… according to the known Jewish ruling that Christians
are idol worshippers.
— Maimonides, quoted by Rabbi Schneerson (63)
A gentile … is liable for the death penalty … if he has
invented a religious holiday for himself … The general principle is we do not
allow them to make new religious rituals and to make 'mitzvahs' for
themselves by their own devices. Rather they may either become a Ger Tzeddek
and accept all the Mitvahs; or [t]he (the Noahide) should stand fast in his
Torah (the seven Noahide Laws) without adding or diminishing … and if he does
make some new 'mitzvah,' we lash him, punish him, and inform him that he is
obligated with the death penalty for this …
— Maimonides (the Rambam) (64)
Gentiles
vs. the Beasts of the Field
In Tractate Sanhedrin 57b
(cited above), we learned that a "heathen" is executed on the
ruling of one judge. Let's compare that rule with the treatment of
Jews and oxen accused of capital crimes. (Footnotes, except for footnote 7,
have been omitted from this excerpt. To read the footnotes and the full
context of the tractate, follow the hot link on the cite.)
MISHNAH. … CAPITAL CASES ARE ADJUDICATED BY
TWENTY-THREE. THE PERSON OR BEAST CHARGED WITH UNNATURAL INTERCOURSE, BY
TWENTY-THREE, AS IT IS WRITTEN, THOU SHALT KILL THE WOMAN AND THE BEAST, AND
ALSO, AND YE SHALL SLAY THE BEAST.
THE OX TO BE STONED (7)
IS TRIED BY TWENTY-THREE, AS IT IS WRITTEN, THE OX SHALL BE STONED AND ITS
OWNER SHALL BE PUT TO DEATH (8) — AS THE DEATH OF THE OWNER, SO THAT OF THE
OX, CAN BE DECIDED ONLY BY TWENTY-THREE.
THE DEATH SENTENCE ON THE
WOLF OR THE LION OR THE BEAR OR THE LEOPARD OR THE HYENA OR THE SERPENT IS TO
BE PASSED BY TWENTY-THREE. (9) R. ELIEZER SAYS: WHOEVER IS FIRST TO KILL THEM
[WITHOUT TRIAL], ACQUIRES MERIT, R. AKIBA, HOWEVER, HOLDS THAT THEIR DEATH IS
TO BE DECIDED BY TWENTY-THREE.
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate
Sanhedrin 2a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 2
Rabbinical scholar and
translator, Jacob Shachter, amplifies the text with these footnotes.
7.
If he gored a person. Ex.
XXI, 28.
8.
Ex. XXI, 29.
9.
Which has killed a human
being.
— Jacob Shachter
A further perspective in
traditional Jewish laws and attitudes concerning Gentiles is contained in What About Gentiles?
(67) See
also US v.
Talmud Law. (66)
Noahides
Killed by Decapitation
In this passage, we see that
heathens (or "sons of Noah") must be killed by decapitation.
GEMARA. …
Our Rabbis taught: [Any man that curseth his God, shall bear his sin.
(3) It would have been sufficient to say], 'A man, etc.:' What is taught by
the expression any man? (4) The inclusion of heathens, to whom
blasphemy is prohibited just as to Israelites, and they are executed by
decapitation; for every death penalty decreed for the sons of Noah is only by
decapitation.(5)
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate
Sanhedrin 56a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page
The translator, Rabbi Dr. H.
Freedman, explains in a footnote that the expression "sons of Noah"
means non-Israelites.
3.
Leviticus XXIV, 15
4.
Lit., 'A man, a man',
Heb. ish ish, [H] [H]
5.
The only place where
death is explicitly decreed for non-Israelites is in Gen. IX, 6: Whoso
sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed. It is a general
law, applicable to all, having been given in the pre-Abrahamic era; his blood
shall be shed must refer to the sword, the only death whereby blood is shed.
— Rabbi Dr. Freedman
The Sages consider
decapitation to be the most hideous way to die because it so disfigures the
corpse. In contrast, Jews who commit idolatry are stoned. (23) To see
footnotes, please follow link at the bottom of the excerpt.
MISHNAH. EXECUTION BY THE SWORD WAS PERFORMED
THUS: THE CONDEMNED MAN WAS DECAPITATED BY THE SWORD, AS IS DONE BY THE CIVIL
AUTHORITIES. R. JUDAH
SAID: THIS IS A HIDEOUS DISFIGUREMENT; BUT HIS HEAD WAS LAID ON A BLOCK AND
SEVERED WITH AN AXE. THEY REPLIED, NO DEATH IS MORE DISFIGURING THAN THIS.
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate
Sanhedrin 52b
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 380
Axe or sword, the end result
is the same.
"Grunts"
Push for Decaptitation
If it seems fantastic that
decapitations might be carried out in the US,
the reader's attention is called to the July
26, 2003 edition of Defense Watch ("The Voice of the
Grunt"). In an article entitled "Anti-Terror Weapon: Off With Their
Heads," Robert G. Williscroft argues that the US
military decapitate "terrorists."
We should have beheaded Saddam's monster sons, and
placed their pigskin-draped heads atop long poles in the center of Baghdad.
Then, one by one, as we capture other high-ranking members of the old regime,
their pigskin-draped heads should join the rotting heads of the Hussein brothers.
— Robert G. Williscroft (73)
Of course, all of the
"terrorists" so far are Gentiles. And once decaptition is used by American
officials on Iraqi Gentiles, the precedent is established. Decaptition
becomes an American practice, and may be used other Gentiles as well.
Defense Watch ("The
Voice of the Grunt") is published
by Soldiers For The Truth (SFTT), which claims to be "a grass-roots
educational organization started by a small group of concerned veterans and
citizens to inform the public, the Congress, and the media on the decline in
readiness of our armed forces … SFTT is headed by retired Army Colonel David
H. Hackworth." (74)
Jesus Led
Israel to
Apostasy
Should Christians be
particularly concerned about all this? As we learned in Jesus' Membrum
in the Talmud, (34) and
Elizabeth Dilling's The Jewish
Religion: Its Influence Today, Chapter III, Jewish teaching holds
that Jesus of Nazareth ("Balaam," "Ben Stada," etc.) was
a false god. He was the bastard son of a woman who played the harlot with
carpenters, He worshipped a brick, performed magic with his sex organ, had
sexual intercourse with his donkey, and attempted to seduce women. He was a
sorcerer who led Israel
to apostasy.
GEMARA. … On
the eve of the Passover Yeshu (6) was hanged. For forty days before the
execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, 'He is going forth to be
stoned because he has practised sorcery and enticed Israel
to apostasy. Any one who can say anything in his favour, let him come forward
and plead on his behalf.' But since nothing was brought forward in his favour
he was hanged on the eve of the Passover!
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate
Sanhedrin 43a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 281
The translator, Rabbi Dr. H.
Freedman amplifies the text in a footnote, citing the Munich
codex of the Talmud (the identity of Jesus is clarified by calling him
"the Nazarean"):
5.
[Ms M. adds 'the
Nazarean'.]
— Rabbi Dr. Freedman
Certainly, Jewish views of
Jesus and His mother are allowable under the Bill of Rights. Christians have
their opinions about other religions, too. However, the present-day Jewish
view of Christianity has consequences in a way that the present-day Christian
view of Judaism does not. Under Judaism, what happens to those who worship a
false god?
MISHNAH. HE WHO ENGAGES IN IDOL-WORSHIP [IS
EXECUTED]. IT IS ALL ONE WHETHER HE SERVE IT, SACRIFICE, OFFER INCENSE, MAKE
LIBATIONS, PROSTRATE HIMSELF, ACCEPT IT AS A GOD, OR SAY TO IT, 'THOU ART MY
GOD' …
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate
Sanhedrin 60b
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 410
Min,
Minim, Minuth
In the Talmud, Christians are
specifically described as "Judeo-Christians" or "min"
(plural "minim"). The following definition of "minuth"
in the Glossary for the Soncino Talmud makes the Talmudic attitude to
Christianity clear:
Minuth — Heresy,
the belief in more than one Power, especially Judeo-Christianity.
— Soncino Talmud
Glossary
Idolater
— Word Covers Many People
Some may assume that
"idolatry" refers to the worship of idols. While that definition is
correct, the word takes on metaphorical application, and may refer to anyone
whose theology differs from that of the Pharisees. For example, Jews who
reject the Talmud and wish to base their law and practices on the Old
Testament only, have in the past, been labeled "idolaters" by the
Pharisaic (Talmud) Jews. See the information on Sadducees and Karaites in Critical Words of
Talmud Study.
Personal
Virtue vs. Enforcement
Before taking up the next
point, let us consider some aspects of religion. There is one aspect of
religion that intends the betterment of the individual through prayer,
meditation, right action, faith, hope, charity, etc. Let us call this aspect
of religion the "religion of personal virtue."
There is, however, a second
aspect of religion. This aspect requires one person to use force against his fellow,
either individually, or more often, through the power of the state. Let us
call this aspect of religion the "religion of enforcement."
Personal
Virtue Religion
None of the teachings of Jesus
require men to use force against one another; instead, Jesus directed the
individual to acquire personal virtue. Among many other things, he said:
3.
Blessed are the poor in
spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4.
Blessed are they that
mourn: for they shall be comforted.
5.
Blessed are the meek: for
they shall inherit the earth.
6.
Blessed are they which do
hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.
7.
Blessed are the merciful:
for they shall obtain mercy.
8.
Blessed are the pure in
heart: for they shall see God.
9.
Blessed are the
peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
10. Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness'
sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
11. Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute
you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.
— Matthew
5:3-11
This writer knows of not one
case of a government attempting to enforce any of the Beatitudes. Nor do we
find Jesus of Nazareth directing His followers to convert others at the point
of a sword, or to kill others because they do not follow His way. (61)
Enforcement
Religion
In contrast, many of the
commands in the Old Testament contain enforcement clauses. For example, this
commandment —
18. Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.
— Exodus
22:18
That commandment requires the
force of the state to carry out the death sentence on a "witch."
The following passage from Deuteronomy 13 requires Old Testament
believers to kill unapproved prophets, miracle workers, and anyone who
preaches another religion.
1.
If there arise among
you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder,
2.
And the sign or the
wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after
other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them;
3.
Thou shalt not
hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the
LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all
your heart and with all your soul.
4.
Ye shall walk after
the LORD your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his
voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.
5.
And that prophet, or
that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn
you away from the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt,
and redeemed you out of the house of bondage, to thrust thee out of the way
which the LORD thy God commanded thee to walk in. So shalt thou put the evil
away from the midst of thee.
6.
If thy brother, the
son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or
thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us
go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers;
7.
Namely, of the gods
of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from
thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth;
8.
Thou shalt not
consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him,
neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:
9.
But thou shalt
surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and
afterwards the hand of all the people.
10. And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die;
because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which
brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.
11. And all Israel
shall hear, and fear, and shall do no more any such wickedness as this is
among you.
— Deuteronomy
13:1-11 (KJV)
There are many similar
injunctions in the Old Testament. In the history of Christendom, we can see
when the Old Testament doctrines dominated the minds of Christian leadership.
When Christendom neglected Old Testament enforcement doctrines, religious
freedom blossomed. Each man looked to the perfection of his own soul, and
left his neighbor's soul to the care of his neighbor.
But now, with the rise of
Judaism in the halls of power, we are looking at a return to Old Testament
state-religion. Particularly, given the strain of Orthodox Judaism in
ascendance, we are looking toward a re-unification of church and state, with
priestly enforcement of Old Testament and Talmudic commandments.
America Is Rapidly
Becoming Talmudized
In 1999, the Supreme Court agreed to consider an amicus
brief based wholly on Talmudic law (see Sentence and
Execution).
In November 2002, the American Orthodox
Jewish community held a kosher dinner in the Supreme Court building to
celebrate the establishment of the National Institute for Judaic Law. (44) The
dinner was attended by 200 people, including three Supreme Court Justices.
The purpose of the Institute is to introduce Talmudic laws into the US
legal system and law schools.
It is thus the clear civic duty of every
American to become intimately acquainted with the Talmud. Read articles at:
Death Penalty: http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/capunish_1.html
Kosher Dinner: http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/cp-jp-11-09-2002 and
http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/cp-jw-01-08-03
The
Planners
We have already met Rabbi
Shmuley Boteach (above), a disciple of the late Rabbi Schneerson and promoter
of the Noahide Laws. In Judaism for Everyone published in 2002, Rabbi
Boteach begins by stating:
This book is written in the belief that the next
thousand years will be a Jewish millennium. For the first time in its long
and trying history, the world's oldest monotheistic faith is going
mainstream.
— Rabbi Boteach (11)
Rabbi Boteach explains in his
own words why Jews should be in the position of control during this
millennium. In the following, be aware that the word "Torah" is
used to denote "Talmud" (see Critical Words of
Talmud Study). (49)
The world cannot be run at human whim. It needs an
ultimate plan and a regulator who can determine whether it is progressing or
regressing. This is the role of the Torah, the divine law, which puts each
contribution into perspective. It organizes all human actions so that they
coalesce into one supremely redeeming blueprint …
… There had to be one people whose supreme
purpose was to reveal this master plan to the world. History required a
nation whose entire purpose was to teach the world Godly ethics and the
contribution the nation could make toward the perfection of the earth …
… The task of the Jews is to be a light
unto the nations. Light is an apt metaphor because it shows the way and
provides guidance. It allows us to clean the room and arrange the furniture
so that the home becomes fit for human habitation. God, too, desires to
reside among man. But we must first make the earth fit to be a royal
residence.
— Rabbi Boteach (12)
Rabbi Boteach goes on to
remind us of the two-track system: Jews are governed by 613 commandments,
Noahides by seven. (12)
Curiously, Rabbi Boteach does not mention the landmark 1991 Congressional
declaration concerning the Noahide Laws on the occasion of his own mentor's
birthday (Rabbi "The Rebbe" Schneerson). Nor does he mention that
Noahides found in violation of the Noahide Laws are sentenced to death under
a one-witness, one-judge, fast-track justice system. That is quite an
oversight!
We are now at the beginning of
the Jewish Millennium. What will life bring in a decade or two? Possibly,
things will be quite all right, in light of Rabbi Boteach's following
statement.
Rabbi
Boteach: Judaism Teaches Tolerance
On page 393 of Judaism for
Everyone, Rabbi Boteach praises tolerance.
Tolerance is an important lesson that Judaism can teach
all world religions. Despite Judaism's being the world's oldest monotheistic
faith, the Jews have never insisted that their beliefs are superior to others
… Coercion is as foreign to Judaism as Christmas.
— Rabbi Boteach (18)
Rabbi
Boteach: Tolerance Is "Repugnant"
Now let us turn to page 280 of
Judaism for Everyone and read as Rabbi Boteach condemns tolerance.
In today's society people pride themselves on their tolerance.
They believe they have progressed beyond the prejudices of the past. They
have learned to allow those opinions that do not necessarily accord with
their own to be voiced. But is this progress?
I find this definition of tolerance
repugnant. Rather than find enrichment or redemption in another's
differences, one tolerates, or stomachs, their differences. One
swallows hard, one suffers — tolerates — another's right to be different.
This is hardly recognizing the virtue than [sic] can be extracted from
another party's distinctiveness. This is a philosophy of segregation rather
than multicultural enrichment. Tolerating another person implies that though
one allows his opinions or differences today, if tomorrow he were to disappear
from the face of the earth, one would hardly notice his absence. There is
nothing to be learned from his conflicting opinion or uniqueness, and his
absence in no way compromises or impairs one's own state of completion.
Promoting or defending the modern definition of tolerance is really a license
to indifference. It is not a call to harmony or multicultural enrichment.
— Rabbi Boteach (8)
This may be a little
worrisome. It seems Rabbi Boteach does not know his own mind. Or does he?
Christians
Make Jews Uncomfortable
Toward the conclusion of Judaism
for Everyone, Rabbi Boteach tells us "why Jews are uncomfortable
with Christianity." (13)
Christians make Jews "uncomfortable" in ten ways summarized in the Appendix:
Why Christianity Makes Jews Uncomfortable. Since Jews will have the power
of life and death over Christians in the upcoming Jewish millennium, Jewish
uncomfortable-ness matters.
Christianity
Is the Ultimate Heresy
Now let us turn to page 401 of
Judaism for Everyone and read as Rabbi Boteach says that Jews condemn Christianity
as the Ultimate Heresy.
Certain beliefs have been deeply engrained into the
Jewish psyche for so many thousands of years, that even the most secular and
disinterested of Jews accept them as axiomatic. Foremost among these is the
simple belief that no man could ever be God. … Man is free, but his liberty
cannot be taken for license.
— Rabbi Boteach (6)
The idea that a man could be God is anathema to
everything that Judaism stands for and everything that Judaism came into this
world to accomplish.
— Rabbi Boteach (57)
For Jews the Belief That God Can Be Human Is the
Ultimate Heresy … The belief that God could have been born of a human womb,
or could once have walked the earth, is so foreign to Judaism that it is
rejected even by the most assimilated Jews. … Christianity, however, sees in
Jesus the incarnation and embodiment of the Second Person of the Trinity, the
Son.
— Rabbi Boteach (15)
What answer does Judaism have
for the Bible literalist, who can point to the many human manifestations of
God recorded in the Bible? (31)
The ancient Rabbis were at pains to emphasize that the
various anthropomorphic descriptions of the Creator in the Bible — the face
of God, His outstretched hand, His back — were nothing more than allegorical
language designed to make the Creator accessible to the human mind.
— Rabbi Boteach (20)
On other issues, however,
Judaism accepts the Bible literally:
In Egypt,
God manifested strict justice toward the wicked Egyptians, destroying their
lives and property through ten plagues. At the splitting of the Red
Sea, He showed Himself to be a warrior who effortlessly decimated
Pharaoh's legions, and simultaneously as a caring Father who rescued the
forlorn Israelites who were plunged in the Red Sea. At
Sinai He was a lawgiver …
— Rabbi Boteach (21)
Can We
Know God's Mind?
Rabbi Boteach tells us this
about Judaism:
Judaism accepts the idea that there can be no positive
description of God. We cannot say what God is, only what He is not.
His being completely transcends human apprehension.
— Rabbi Boteach (21)
If this is true, and God
transcends human apprehension, how can Judaism be so certain He would never
want to take human form, or could not do so if He wanted to? Christians may
be puzzled by this.
Is God
Man, or Is Man God?
The concept that God cannot
take on man characteristics is an interesting one — Rabbis believe man
can take on God characteristics. That belief is illustrated in the
following passages. In the first passage, we learn that Raba says it is possible
for man to create, and we learn that Rabbah created a man. We also learn two
other rabbis created a calf and ate it.
GEMARA. …
Raba said: If the righteous desired it, they could [by living a life of
absolute purity] be creators, for it is written, But your iniquities have
distinguished between etc. (7) Rabbah created a man, (8) and sent him to
R. Zera. R. Zera spoke to him, but received no answer. Thereupon he said unto
him: 'Thou art a creature of the magicians. Return to thy dust.'
R. Hanina and R. Oshaia spent every
Sabbath eve in studying the 'Book of Creation', (9) by means of which they
created a third-grown calf (10) and ate it.
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin
65b
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 446
Talmud translator Rabbi Dr. H.
Freedman amplifies the text with footnotes.
7.
Isa. LIX, 2.
8.
Ibid. Raba understands mabadilim
in the sense of 'draw a distinction'. But for their iniquities, their power
would equal God's, and they could create a world.
9.
By means of the Sefer
Yezirah, Book of Creation. V. next note.
10. The Book of Creation, Heb. Sefer Yezirah, is the
title of two esoteric books. The older, referred to here, was a
thaumaturgical work popular in the Talmudic period. It was also known as Hilkoth
Yezirah (Laws of Creation), and is so called in the same story quoted on [Sanhedrin]
67b. Rashi there states that the creation was performed by means of
mystic combinations of the Divine Name, which does not come under the ban of
witchcraft. Its basic idea is that the Creation was accomplished by means of
the power inherent in those letters (Cf. Rab's saying: 'Bezalel knew how to
combine the letters by which heaven and earth were created'. Ber. 55a.
Cf. also Enoch LXI, 3 et seq.; Prayer of Manasseh: Ecc. R. III, 11 on
the magic power of the letters of the Divine Name), and that this same power
could be utilised in further creation. The work was ascribed to Abraham,
which fact indicates an old tradition, and the possible antiquity of the book
itself. It has affinities with Babylonian, Egyptian, and Hellenic mysticism
and its origin has been placed in the second century B.C.E., when such a
combination of influences might be expected. It is noteworthy that Raba's
statement above, though not mentioning the Sefer Yezirah, insists on freedom
from sin as a prerequisite of creation by man, v. J.E., XII, 602.
11. (I.e., a calf that has reached one third of its full
growth; others interpret: (i) in its third year; (ii) third born, fat].
— Rabbi Dr. Freedman
Note Rabbi Dr. Freedman's
mention of Sefer
Yezirah, a translation of which is on line at Come and Hear™. (59) The
reader may also be interested in Elizabeth
Dilling's comments on the Sefer Yezirah. (60) This
account of the rabbis creating a calf and eating it is repeated in Tractate
Sanhedrin 67b.
In the following passage,
someone called Jannai changes a woman into an ass and rides her. He is
apparently embarrassed when someone else breaks his spell, the woman becomes
human again, and he is seen "riding upon a woman in public."
GEMARA. …
Jannai came to an inn. He said to them, 'Give me a drink of water,' and they
offered him shattitha. Seeing the lips of the woman [who brought him
this] moving, he [covertly] spilled a little thereof, which turned to snakes.
Then he said, 'As I have drunk of yours, now do you come and drink of mine.'
So he gave her to drink, and she was turned into an ass. He then rode upon her
into the market. But her friend came and broke the charm [changing her back
into a human being], and so he was seen riding upon a woman in public.
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate
Sanhedrin 67b
Soncino 1961 Edition, pages 460-461
Tripartite
God Is Illogical, Unacceptable
Leaving aside the question of
whether God could take human form if He wanted to, Judaism teaches that God
cannot manifest himself in three aspects
Judaism Conceives of God as an Absolute Unity … Christianity, however, maintains a divine
Trinity of three Persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, which
together form the mysterium tremendum (overwhelming mystery) of
Christian beliefs … Christianity thus affirms a belief in a tripartite God,
which to Judaism is illogical and unacceptable.
— Rabbi Boteach (7)
Bi-partite,
Poly-partite God is Logical, Acceptable
While repudiating the idea
that God can manifest in three aspects, Judaism sidesteps the "Ultimate
Unity" to assert that God can easily manifest in numbers other than
three. For example, God can assume Male and Female emanations. It's time to
meet the Shechinah, the female emanation of God (some say Her name is
pronounced "Shock 'N Awe"). Rabbi Boteach introduces Her in Judaism
for Everyone:
The idea of a woman reflecting a female component in
the Godhead is a central idea of the Kabbalah. The woman is the Shekhinah,
the Divine Presence, commanding increased respect. The Zohar, the key
work of Jewish mysticism, in a famous passage, says:
It is incumbent on a man to be ever "male and
female" [married] in order that his faith may be firm, and that the
Shekhinah may never depart from him. What, then, will you say, of a man who
goes on a journey and, being absent from his wife, is no longer "male
and female"? His remedy is to pray to God before he starts his journey,
while he is still "male and female," in order to draw to himself the
presence of his Maker. When he has offered his prayer and thanksgiving and
the Shekhinah rests on him, then he can depart, for through his union with
the Shekhinah he has become "male and female" in the country as he
was "male and female" in the town … When he does return home again,
it is his duty to give his wife pleasure, because it was she who acquired for
him his heavenly partner. (Zohar, Genesis, 49b-50a)
— Rabbi Boteach (14)
In his Foreword to the Soncino
Talmud (1935), the Very Reverend the Chief Rabbi of the British Empire, the
late Dr. Joseph H. Hertz, quotes the Talmud Sage Rab to the effect that God
(male) and the Shechinah (female) can be feeling and doing different things
simultaneously, as though they were separate entities:
‘Since the Exile,’ he declares, ‘the Shechinah mourns,
and God prays: Be it My will that in My dealings with My children My mercy
overcome My justice.’
— Rabbi Dr. Hertz (51)
The Shechinah appears in the
Talmud. She is mentioned seventy times in the 1952 General Index, and once
again under an alternate spelling, "Shekinah."
Shechinah, Ber. 191, Shab. 141, 152,
257, 298, 319. 411f, 415, 'Er.
444, Pes. 32, 279, Yom. 11,
95, 102, 121, 421, Suk. 15,
210, Meg. 132, 157, 175,
MK. 48, 156, 192, Hag. 98,
100, Yeb. 304, 320, 412f,
Sot. 11, 18f, 43f, 52, 63, 65,
68, 197 et passim, Kid. 150,
153, BK. 471, BB. 124f, 127,
233, San. 27f, 46, 83, 85, 121,
230, 245, 249f, 271, 304,
652, 659f, 664, 700, 702,
705f, 720, 733, 755f, Ab. 30f,
Zeb. 489, 577, Tam. 8, 22,
Nid. 87. See also Shekinah.
— qualifications for reception
of, Shab. 441, Pes. 599f.
…
Shekinah, AZ. 69. See also Shechinah.
— Soncino Talmud General Index
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 376, 377
To learn about the Shechinah
in the Talmud, use the Come and Hear™ Search page.
Rabbi Boteach also describes
other manifestations of the Godhead (En-Sof), including the ten sefirot,
or mystic spheres, or colors, or emotions. (22)
The relationship between God's essence, referred to by
the Kabbalists as the En Sof (literally, "there is no end"), and
the ten sefirot is analogous to clear water being placed into ten
glasses, each of different color. Red would represent God's anger, blue His
compassion, green His splendor, and so on. Viewed from the outside, the water
will invariably appear red, blue, green, or yellow, depending on the color of
glass into which it is placed. In reality, however, the water has not changed
color at all and only appears this way to the outside observer.
— Rabbi Boteach (20)
So then, Rabbi Boteach tells
us that some people are on the outside of God, and some are on the inside. He
also identifies two other manifestations of the Ein-Sof: the Tetragrammaton
(YHWH) and Elokim. YHWH is the attribute of Mercy, and Elokim the attribute
of Justice.
Elizabeth Dilling, the
Protestant Christian author of The Jewish Religion: Its influence Today,
believes that Judaism is not monotheistic. For further information, see Chapter VI, Judaism
Not Monotheistic, Chapter VII, Judaism
and Paganism, and Chapter VIII, Demonology
of the Pharisees. (35)
What is the truth, then? Can
God manifest Himself as three, or more than a dozen? It is beyond the scope
of Come and Hear™ to settle these issues. We mention them simply to help
achieve Rabbi Sachs' goal: that we find out about each other's faiths (see What We're About (36)).
No
Original Sin
In the following, be aware
that the word "Torah" is often used to denote Talmud. See Critical Words of
Talmud Study. (49) The
following statements were excerpted from three contiguous pages — the
ellipses (…) indicate omitted text, following a thread in Rabbi Boteach's
thinking.
Jews Do Not Believe in Original Sin and the Fall of
Man, a Cornerstone of Christian Faith.
… Judaism does not promote the idea that people are born either meritorious
or sinful. Rather the individual is born innocent … The Torah does speak of
Adam's sin. But it teaches that man can rise above it. Righteousness may be
challenging, but it was for this treason that God gave humankind the Torah.
— Rabbi Boteach (17)
Original Sin is a critical
point of departure between Christians and Jews. Many Christians believe
Original Sin prevents man from attaining perfection, and that political power
must be limited for fear of doing evil on a grand scale. Without the Original
Sin doctrine, men have no inhibition about the concentration of political
power.
Jews
Focus on This World, Christians the Next
To understand the import of the
following, be aware that the word "Torah" is most commonly used to
denote the Talmud. See Critical Words of
Talmud Study. (49)
Christianity Is Oriented Toward the Next World, Judaism
Toward This World. Christianity posits that the purpose of man is to achieve
the salvation of his soul and to attain everlasting life in Paradise …
Judaism is oriented toward this world and steadfastly promotes the idea that man's
purpose is to perfect the world and bring godliness into an otherwise
un-Godly planet.
— Rabbi Boteach, (10)
(emphasis added)
So then, we understand that
since Judaism introduces God into this un-Godly heathen world, Jews have a
special mission. They must assume authority over all mankind, lest
un-Godliness prevail. Jews remember what Jesus said:
36. My Kingdom is not of this world.
— Jesus of Nazareth,
as quoted in John
18:36 (KJV)
But the Jews know their
kingdom is of this world. Talmud Law assumes authority over all
mankind, not just those who agree with it; Just as explorers in the New
World lay claim to lands that are new to them, and lay claim to
the native populations, the Jews lay claim to this world, and all its native
populations.
We now understand Rabbi
Boteach's interest in the distinction — those who believe in "this
world" will rule over those who believe in the "next world."
Rabbi Jacob Neusner, writing
in 1995, expresses the same thought in almost the same words.
The Talmud is a public, political, anonymous,
collective, social statement; its compilers intended to define the life of
the public polity by forming the kingdom
of God in the here and now …
— Rabbi Dr. Neusner (46)
A kingdom
of God in the here and now, based
on the Talmud.
Judaism
Is the Universal Religion
In the Jewish Millennium,
there is no need for a religion other than Judaism.
Christianity is a supremely proselytizing faith. Since
Christianity affirms that none shall come unto the Father except through the
Son, it takes the view that there is only one road to truth, one path to
salvation.
Judaism, however, is a supremely
universalist religion, teaching that there are several paths to the one, true
God. A non-Jew does not enhance his existence by becoming Jewish, and indeed
a righteous Gentile who leads a godly and moral life will inherit the same
place in the world-to-come as a Jew.
Nine hundred years ago, Maimonides wrote
that non-Jews who live by the seven Noahide commandments would inherit the
same place in heaven as a Jew.
— Rabbi Boteach (19)
But in reality, the
"several" paths to Heaven are just one for each: Rabbinical Judaism
for Jews, and rabbinical Noahidism for Gentiles. With a death penalty for
people who stray from the path, it's a simple, workable system.
Judaism
and Tolerance
Before we go on to meet our
next guest, Rabbi Daniel Lapin, let us review some facets of Jewish law
concerning the treatment of those who will not conform to the Jewish
religion. We have already read Deuteronomy 13:1-11, wherein we learn that if
our brother, our son, our daughter, or our wife strays from the path of
Judaism, we must kill them — without hesitation.
1.
If there arise among
you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder,
2.
And the sign or the
wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after
other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them;
3.
Thou shalt not
hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the
LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all
your heart and with all your soul.
4.
Ye shall walk after
the LORD your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his
voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.
5.
And that prophet, or
that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn
you away from the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt,
and redeemed you out of the house of bondage, to thrust thee out of the way
which the LORD thy God commanded thee to walk in. So shalt thou put the evil
away from the midst of thee.
6.
If thy brother, the
son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or
thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us
go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers;
7.
Namely, of the gods
of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from
thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth;
8.
Thou shalt not
consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him,
neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:
9.
But thou shalt
surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and
afterwards the hand of all the people.
10. And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die;
because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which
brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.
11. And all Israel
shall hear, and fear, and shall do no more any such wickedness as this is
among you.
— Deuteronomy
13:1-11 (KJV)
It's different from what we're
used to, yes. Among Christians, Protestant and Catholics sometimes marry and
one party consents to the religion of the other. Even if one family might
regard the in-laws' religion as heresy, people try to get along without
killing each other.
Building on the work of other
researchers, we have collected some references showing Jewish tolerance for
other religious faiths and cultures. See In His Own
Image (32)
and What About
Gentiles? (67)
The second half of Deuteronomy
13 deals with the treatment of whole towns and tribes that fall into
idolatry, and as we shall see in a moment, it is the subject of particular
attention by the Talmud Scribes.
12. If thou shalt hear say in one of thy cities, which the
LORD thy God hath given thee to dwell there, saying,
13. Certain men, the children of Belial, are gone out from
among you, and have withdrawn the inhabitants of their city, saying, Let us
go and serve other gods, which ye have not known;
14. Then shalt thou enquire, and make search, and ask
diligently; and, behold, if it be truth, and the thing certain, that such
abomination is wrought among you;
15. Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with
the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly, and all that is therein, and
the cattle thereof, with the edge of the sword.
16. And thou shalt gather all the spoil of it into the midst
of the street thereof, and shalt burn with fire the city, and all the spoil
thereof every whit, for the LORD thy God: and it shall be an heap for ever;
it shall not be built again.
17. And there shall cleave nought of the cursed thing to
thine hand: that the LORD may turn from the fierceness of his anger, and shew
thee mercy, and have compassion upon thee, and multiply thee, as he hath
sworn unto thy fathers;
18. When thou shalt hearken to the voice of the LORD thy God,
to keep all his commandments which I command thee this day, to do that which
is right in the eyes of the LORD thy God.
— Deuteronomy
13:11-18 (KJV)
The Talmud implements this
Biblical passage as Judaic law in the Mishnah for Sanhedrin 111b, with some
details and modifications. (33) The
Jewish state must exterminate "false prophets" and entire tribes
and cities who have fallen into idolatry. (For further discussion on this
point, see Holy
Atrocities and Judaism.) Sanhedrin 2a lays down some regulations. (Ellipses
indicate we have omitted text. To see the full text and the footnotes, follow
the link at the end of the excerpt.)
MISHNAH. … A TRIBE, A FALSE PROPHET AND A HIGH
PRIEST CAN ONLY BE TRIED BY A COURT OF SEVENTY-ONE …[text omitted]… SMALL
SANHEDRINS FOR THE TRIBES CAN BE INSTITUTED ONLY BY A COURT OF SEVENTY-ONE
…[text omitted]… NO CITY CAN BE DECLARED CONDEMNED SAVE BY A DECREE OF A
COURT OF SEVENTY-ONE. A FRONTIER TOWN
CANNOT BE CONDEMNED NOR THREE CITIES AT A TIME, BUT ONLY ONE OR TWO.
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate
Sanhedrin 2a
Soncino 1961 Edition, pages 1-2
We wonder how the Simon
Wiesenthal Center's
Museum of Tolerance
would address these matters. (24)
No Images
or Icons, Ever
It seems that not only are
Jews uncomfortable with Christianity, they are very uncomfortable with
Christianity. Now Rabbi Boteach expands. He says from the beginning of their history,
Jews have sought to destroy the religious artifacts of non-Jewish religions.
Notice that he says Judaism forbids the use of visual images in any religion,
ever.
Images and icons — the image of the crucifix foremost
among them — are absolutely central to Catholicism and figure prominently in
Protestantism as well … From the outset Judaism aimed to destroy the idols
and false Gods that ancient man was wont to worship. Therefore, no visual
images can ever be employed in prayer and religious devotions.
— Rabbi Boteach (16)
One wonders what will happen
to the great works of art produced by the West — the ceiling of the Sistine
chapel, the Madonnas of the Italian masters, the religious statuary — during
the Jewish millennium? Will Judaism destroy those works of art, those
"idols"? Though Rabbi Boteach is silent on the issue, the
implication is worrisome.
|
|
|
Creation of Man by Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni,
1508-12, Fresco, Cappella Sistina, Vatican.
|
We need to understand that
Rabbi Boteach is well positioned and not at all a "loose cannon." Judaism
for Everyone was published by Basic Books, and his Kosher Sex was
published by Doubleday. The flyleaf of Judaism for Everyone indicates
thirteen published works by Rabbi Boteach. According to the dust jacket,
"In 2000, he became the first Rabbi ever to win the highly prestigious London
Times Preacher of the Year Award, garnering more points than anyone in
the competition's history."
Rabbi
Lapin Loves Christianity
Rabbi Daniel Lapin is a radio
talk show host, lecturer, President of Toward Tradition, and the author of America's
Real War (published in 1999). Rabbi Lapin says he is an ally of the
Christian right, and he is a favorite speaker of organizations such as
Concerned Women for America.
In America's Real War,
Rabbi Lapin says there is a real war is between those who want a secular
nation and those who stand for "a spiritual America."
(25)
Rabbi Lapin's book is clearly intended to be read by right-wing Christians.
Here, Rabbi Lapin states that he is deeply puzzled by Jewish organizations
that engage in anti-Christian bigotry.
Although many of them were founded explicitly to fight
bigotry, and for many years did just that, today the shrill rhetoric and
hate-filled propaganda found in their direct mail is discriminatory and
divisive … God's blueprint clearly included the emergence of Christianity.
After all, Christianity has brought monotheism to more people than any other
force during the past two millennia.
— Rabbi Lapin (page 12) (26)
As an Orthodox rabbi, I will make a compelling case for
America as a
Christian nation and the need for our nation to be based on Judeo-Christian
ethic in order to survive.
— Rabbi Lapin (page 14) (26)
Rabbi Lapin entitles Chapter
Six of America's Real War, "The Curious Rise of
Anti-Christianism." He informs his readers that the American Jewish
Committee (AJC) and the Anti-defamation League (ADL) have attacked the
Christian Right because the Christian right attacks homosexuality. He makes
common cause:
"For over three thousand
years, Jewish tradition and Jewish law have been unambiguous about
homosexuality. It is a sin." This is not quite true — Judaism permits
homosexuality provided the passive partner is under nine years of age.
Consenting adults are given the death penalty. See Sex with Children
by Talmud Rules
According to his own words,
Rabbi Lapin spent "many years of study at the theological academy (or
yeshiva) of Kfar Hassidim in Israel."
(39) He
comes from a family of rabbis. His two brothers are rabbis. His father was a
rabbi, his uncles and cousins taught Talmud at the Gateshead Talmudic Academy
in England; (28) he is
a disciple of his great uncle Rabbi Eliyahu Lapian, whose works are in the
Chabad Lubavitch library in Brooklyn, New
York. (40) See
the biography of Rabbi Eliyahu Lapian at the Union of Orthodox Jewish
Congregations of America ("Orthodox Union") web site. (69)
In light of his background,
Rabbi Lapin must know the Talmud is anti-Christian. The rise of
anti-Christianism could not be "curious" to him. See, for example,
the Jewish attitudes and laws concerning Gentiles discussed in What About Gentiles? (67)
In Chapter Thirty-Two,
"Sex Is Everyone's Business," Rabbi Lapin mentions the Noahide
Laws:
Known collectively as the Seven Laws of the Sons of
Noah, these laws are indispensable for the survival of any human society. One
of the seven establishes courts of law. Another rejects homosexuality as a
valid lifestyle.
— Rabbi Lapin (27)
We have already seen the
Soncino Talmud translation of the Noahide Laws, and there is no mention of
homosexuality.
GEMARA. …
Our Rabbis taught: seven precepts were the sons of Noah commanded: social
laws; to refrain from blasphemy, idolatry; adultery; bloodshed; robbery; and
eating flesh cut from a living animal …
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate
Sanhedrin 56a
Soncino 1961 Edition, pages 381-382
We wonder which of these Rabbi
Lapin is interpreting as a prohibition of homosexual lifestyle. Could he have
arrived at the prohibition through exegesis? (See Israel's "One
Indigenous Science".)
Like Rabbi Boteach, Rabbi
Lapin does not mention the landmark 1991 Congressional declaration concerning
the Noahide Laws, and he does not mention every Christian who practices his
faith will suffer the death penalty.
If Rabbi Lapin sincerely wants
Christianity to survive, we cannot help but notice:
- Rabbi Lapin is a heretic
to Judaism, and
- Rabbi Lapin is
overwhelmingly negligent: he promotes the Noahide laws when he should be
warning Christian that the Noahide system will spell the end of
Christianity.
A
Stumbling Block
Rabbi Lapin mentions the
Jewish prohibition against putting a stumbling block before the blind:
… this law simply prohibits us from deriving economic
benefit from information that we have deliberately withheld for another. In
other words, do not "trip" up someone economically after you have
made him "blind" — Feeling assured that your colleague is not
concealing material information from you certainly makes it more likely that
you would trade with him. Thus we see that part of the Jewish contribution to
the world has always included "filling in the blanks."
— Rabbi Lapin(29)
We cannot explain why Rabbis
Boteach and Lapin have omitted the vital information about the enforcement of
the Noahide Laws while promoting them as a panacea to humankind. The
enforcement clause of any set of laws is essential to their workability, and
is always vitally interesting to anyone studying them. Failing to provide
that vital data about enforcement the Noahide Laws may well qualify as
putting "a stumbling block before the blind."
It may be that the rabbis are
embarrassed about the Talmud prescribing decapitation for recalcitrant
Noahides — decapitation is, after all, old fashioned. If, however, Jewish
leadership has other plans for the punishment of Christians, it would be best
to disclose them. We clearly prefer the principles of openness and full
disclosure that Rabbi A. James Rudin, Senior Interreligious Advisor
recommends to the Vatican.
On the Vatican's
decision to partially open its wartime archives, Rabbi Rudin states:
… one thing is clear. Partial, incomplete or
pre-selected archival records will not be enough in a world where
transparency and full disclosure is now the norm if an institution — whether
political, financial or spiritual — is to maintain its integrity. What is
needed now is for the Vatican
to fully open its World War II records.
— Rabbi Rudin (41)
But even more importantly, the
omission of vital information about the death penalty provisions of the
Noahide Laws prevents us from learning about each others' faiths. Recall that
this website was inspired by the Very Rev. the Chief Rabbi of United Hebrew
Congregations, Jonathan Sachs. Rabbi Sachs' declared goal is to improve
religious tolerance worldwide.
Rather than find fault with
the efforts of Rabbis Boteach and Lapin to teach the public about the Noahide
Laws, let us help them to fill in the information gaps. Print out a copy of
this article and give it to your Christian friends, your ministers, and
anyone of good faith who sincerely loves the Bill of Rights. Download a copy
of this web site to your own disc, make CDs, and put them in the hands of
responsible organizations throughout the country.
Further distribution
suggestions are to be found on the Download page. (5)
For more information on the
Noahide Law popularizers and advocates, see Merry Christmas, and Off
with Your Head! (37) and The
Noah's Covenant Web Site (48) An Internet
search engine will bring up many other references as well, using all the
alternate spellings.
Thank you for your consideration
of the above,
Carol A. Valentine,
Ear@Come-and-Hear.com
July 14, 2003 ( This
article is on line at
http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_1.html )
Postscript:
See also Congressional support for religious school in the amount of
$500,000.
Forward, December 19, 2003:
Congress
To Aid Lakewood Yeshiva
http://www.forward.com/issues/2003/03.12.19/news4b.html
Endnotes:
This and other Come and
Hear™ Studies on Talmudic Judaism can be found online:
http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor
The
Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today by Elizabeth Dilling,
complete with all 300 exhibits, can be found online:
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling
Soncino Babylonian Talmud tractates, with Forewords,
Introductions, Glossary, List of Abbreviations, and footnotes. Now you can
study the Babylonian Talmud in full context and with the running commentary
of the finest scholars of Judaism:
Tractate
Berakoth: http://www.come-and-hear.com/berakoth
Tractate
Shabbath: http://www.come-and-hear.com/shabbath
Tractate
Yebamoth: http://www.come-and-hear.com/yebamoth
Tractate
Kethuboth: http://www.come-and-hear.com/kethuboth
Tractate
Nedarim: http://www.come-and-hear.com/nedarim
Tractate
Nazir: http://www.come-and-hear.com/nazir
Tractate
Sotah: http://www.come-and-hear.com/sotah
Tractate
Gittin: http://www.come-and-hear.com/gittin
Tractate
Baba Kamma: http://www.come-and-hear.com/babakamma
Tractate
Baba Mezi'a: http://www.come-and-hear.com/babamezia
Tractate
Baba Bathra: http://www.come-and-hear.com/bababathra
Tractate
Sanhedrin: http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin
Tractate
Abodah Zarah: http://www.come-and-hear.com/zarah
Tractate
Horayoth: http://www.come-and-hear.com/horayoth
Tractate
Niddah: http://www.come-and-hear.com/niddah
Tractate
Tohoroth: http://www.come-and-hear.com/tohoroth
Search
the Talmud http://www.come-and-hear.com/tindex.html
Download all the above resources for local study, CD,
or mirror web site:
http://www.come-and-hear.com/download
Appendix:
Why Christianity Makes Jews Uncomfortable
Here are the "Ten
Essential Differences" that make Jews uncomfortable about Christianity,
according to Rabbi Shmuley Boteach (see Judaism for Everyone, pages
403 through 412). In Judaism for Everyone, each point is followed by a
short essay explaining the issue. The point headings are copied verbatim from
the book and appear in italics. The supporting comments are summarized
in the Come and Hear™ editor's own words, or in a phrase excerpted from the
essay.
- Judaism Conceives of
God as an Absolute Unity. (No Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.)
- For Jews, the Belief
That God Can Be Human Is the Ultimate Heresy. (No Jesus, no icons,
no Crucifix.)
- Jews Do Not Believe in
Original Sin and the Fall of Man, a Cornerstone of Christian Faith.
(Judaism believes man is born innocent.)
- In Judaism, the Messiah
Has a Political and Physical Role, Not a Spiritual One. (The real
Messiah establishes Jewish political autonomy, restores the Jewish
monarchy, gathers the Jewish exiles from the Diaspora, and rebuilds the Temple.)
- To Christians, Jesus
Was the Messiah, or Christ, Predicted by the Prophets of the Bible and
Awaited by the Jews. (The Messiah will not be the Son of God, but
human.)
- Jews Believe the
Covenant Between God and the People of Israel
Embodied in the Hebrew Scriptures to Be Eternally Valid. (The land
of Canaan belongs to the
Jews. New Testament teachings are unacceptable.)
- Christianity is Oriented
Toward the Next World, Judaism toward This World. ("Judaism is
oriented towards this world and steadfastly promotes the idea that that
man's purpose is to perfect the world and bring Godliness to an
otherwise un-Godly planet.")
- In Contrast to Judaism,
Christianity Advocates an Intermediary between God and Man.
(Rabbi Boteach does not explain the role of the Talmudic Sages who
reveal the very Word of God. See Critical
Words More
Critical Words. Nor does he explain the role of Moses, the prophets
of the Old Testament, or the rabbis who interpret the Talmud/Torah. In
Judaism, intermediaries happen.)
- Historically, Jews have
Been the Objects of Christian Missionary Activities. (See The
613 Commandments, numbers 37 through 41, which command Jews
"Not to love the missionary," "Not to cease hating the
missionary," "Not to save the missionary," "Not to
say anything in his defense," "Not to refrain from
incriminating him.")
- Judaism is based on
God's revelation to and Covenant with the People. ("Judaism is
predicated on the belief of a collective divine revelation at the foot
of Mount Sinai to the entire assembled House of Israel … Christianity,
in contrast, is predicated on the teachings of a single man/deity as
revealed to the apostles." Of course, God spoke only to Moses
on Mt. Sinai,
and the conversations at the foot of Mount Sinai
were between Moses and "the entire assembled House of
Israel;" and Jesus spoke not just to the apostles, but to everyone
who would listen …)
|